New nightly

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Spacebux
    Adept
    • Apr 2009
    • 231

    #91
    Originally posted by Napsterbater
    Turn off squelch if that happens, and get in the habit of inscribing !k on the stuff you don't want squelched. You didn't lose your DSM, it's still there, if you just turn off squelch. It's in options.
    In my nightly, it appears as though the 's' toggle switch no longer functions in the '~' object menu.

    Thank you, though, for the suggestions.

    I think the squelch function is lumping all body armor into one category for the squelch options now. Either it is on or off; you can set the level to 'good', 'excellent', 'artifact only' squelch levels (which is a great idea, I think), but it encompasses all body armor - DSM and other. It would be greater still if DSM were classified separately.

    Comment

    • d_m
      Angband Devteam member
      • Aug 2008
      • 1517

      #92
      Originally posted by Timo Pietilä
      Go to item-menu "~" and make auto-inscription there for DSM:s to prevent squelch. OTOH I also think that DSM:s should count as ego even without actually be ego for squelch-purposes.
      I have also always wanted what I considered "exotic" base types (like blades of chaos, DSM, etc) to be handled separately from "normal" weapons/armor.
      linux->xterm->screen->pmacs

      Comment

      • Derakon
        Prophet
        • Dec 2009
        • 9022

        #93
        The squelch toggle is now 'K', Spacebux; just hit that while wandering around the dungeon and see all the items you don't normally have to deal with!

        Comment

        • Spacebux
          Adept
          • Apr 2009
          • 231

          #94
          Originally posted by Derakon
          The squelch toggle is now 'K', Spacebux; just hit that while wandering around the dungeon and see all the items you don't normally have to deal with!
          Aha..! thank you! O-'K'.

          Comment

          • Spacebux
            Adept
            • Apr 2009
            • 231

            #95
            Minor bug.. (known/fixed issue?)

            When casting Meteor Swarm (and, I expect this happens in other situations, such as multi-swing melee):

            The Balance drake screams in pain.
            The Balance drake dies.
            The Balance drake flees in terror!


            ... wrong sequence of messages.

            r9a0d219cc4

            Comment

            • Magnate
              Angband Devteam member
              • May 2007
              • 5110

              #96
              Originally posted by Spacebux
              When casting Meteor Swarm (and, I expect this happens in other situations, such as multi-swing melee):

              The Balance drake screams in pain.
              The Balance drake dies.
              The Balance drake flees in terror!


              ... wrong sequence of messages.

              r9a0d219cc4
              Good catch - I think this is a regression. I've added it to #726 in any case.
              "Been away so long I hardly knew the place, gee it's good to be back home" - The Beatles

              Comment

              • Timo Pietilä
                Prophet
                • Apr 2007
                • 4096

                #97
                Originally posted by Spacebux
                When casting Meteor Swarm (and, I expect this happens in other situations, such as multi-swing melee):

                The Balance drake screams in pain.
                The Balance drake dies.
                The Balance drake flees in terror!


                ... wrong sequence of messages.

                r9a0d219cc4
                There was a discussion a while back that meteor swarm should work like separate bolts each. What you are seeing is all the meteors striking the same target (even that it was already dead after two). If that meteor swarm behavior is changed that message problem should also go away.

                Comment

                • scud
                  Swordsman
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 323

                  #98
                  Originally posted by d_m
                  I have also always wanted what I considered "exotic" base types (like blades of chaos, DSM, etc) to be handled separately from "normal" weapons/armor.
                  Yes please. 'Elven cloaks' get their own category; surely DSM could be added. Not sure about weaponry, though... could it be done by value, ie if it's got an RRP in excess of 50k it doesn't get squished? That would weed out the elemental brands and Defenders, the 'standard' extra blows and Gondolins etc, but leave you with the good Chaoses, Slicings, and Furies. If the squish-price were player-definable then all the better.

                  Originally posted by scud
                  Now CL47 and only a single pair of BoS so far (and those a measly +6). Has the correction to the 'Supermarket Sweep Shoe Shop Special' made BoS less common than they were In The Pre-SSSSS Days, or have I just being unlucky so far? I'm wearing my Wormtongues which I found at CL43 – they and/or Dal-i-thalion always used to be waiting for me on the floor at 500'.

                  However I do have very attractive Chaos DSM of Permanence (rPois, Chaos, Disen). Which is nice.
                  I finally traded in the Wormtongues for some strappy sandals of Speed +9 at CL49. I'm pretty sure that was only the second pair I've found. I've lost count of the number of sub +10 RoS I've chucked away.

                  I've also just received an armour upgrade...



                  My first ever PDSM, I think. I don't wish to sound ungrateful but is nether always missing, or is one higher resistance randomly omitted?

                  Comment

                  • Derakon
                    Prophet
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 9022

                    #99
                    Base PDSM is missing nexus and nether; you got nexus as your bonus resistance from the Permanence ego.

                    Also, PDSM should probably lose RES_CONFU since it's not a resistance any more.

                    Comment

                    • Magnate
                      Angband Devteam member
                      • May 2007
                      • 5110

                      Originally posted by scud
                      Yes please. 'Elven cloaks' get their own category; surely DSM could be added.
                      IMO this it totally the wrong way to go, special-casing particular tvals. It means a total redesign every time someone adds an important new item.
                      Not sure about weaponry, though... could it be done by value, ie if it's got an RRP in excess of 50k it doesn't get squished? That would weed out the elemental brands and Defenders, the 'standard' extra blows and Gondolins etc, but leave you with the good Chaoses, Slicings, and Furies. If the squish-price were player-definable then all the better.
                      This, OTOH, is a brilliant solution. Instead of the awkward quality squelch thresholds we have now ("good", "excellent without high resists" etc.), people can just put a price threshold into each category, and squelch anything below that value. The main issue that comes to mind is that we would need to show the sale value of an item in its description, which we have debated previously and decided against (spoily).

                      People who don't like power-based pricing will hate this, of course - and some of them have very strong views on squelching. And it isn't going to be an option, that's for sure. So it's probably time for a poll.
                      "Been away so long I hardly knew the place, gee it's good to be back home" - The Beatles

                      Comment

                      • scud
                        Swordsman
                        • Jan 2011
                        • 323

                        Originally posted by Magnate
                        The main issue that comes to mind is that we would need to show the sale value of an item in its description, which we have debated previously and decided against (spoily).
                        Fired with enthusiasm for the idea and in the interests of research I went on a quick weapon hunt prior to my second cup of coffee...



                        ALWAYS HAVE THAT SECOND CUP.

                        Surely it's not necessary to make item values visible? You don't have to have played the game long to have a pretty good idea of what something is worth. It's a squelchy timesaver rather than a cheat.

                        In the early game when there are still things you want/need to buy, you don't want to waste time hauling sub-2k (say) weaponry and armour up to the surface. Obviously you've still have had the trouble/expense of IDing the thing.

                        Once money becomes no object (which doesn't take long) you have to wade through an awful lot of tatty weapons to find something worthy of consideration. Again, you still need to ID. A high value squelch setting would simply get rid of all those tiresome *slays* and Blesseds and such. Hell, I'd happily see it squelch artifacts: what use is a *thanc once you're strong and dextrous enough to wave something heavier?

                        It puts a lot of faith in the pricing system, of course. Some 'tat' seems to have exceptionally high value placed on it (I'm looking at you, Defenders), but I'm not aware of any significant under-valuations.

                        Comment

                        • buzzkill
                          Prophet
                          • May 2008
                          • 2939

                          Originally posted by Magnate
                          IMO this it totally the wrong way to go, special-casing particular tvals.
                          You're probably correct... if we had something that worked better to use instead, which, after exhaustive discussion, we don't. Why not just special case them for now and see how that works out (as seems to be the philosophy in current dev), until we come up with a real solution that will fit all cases.

                          Is it perfect, no. Is it better for the end user, even if it's not an ideal solution from a dev point of view, yes.

                          Price based squelching if implemented IMO we end up being different, but no better. Trading the set of problems we have now for a slightly different set of problems, yet to be known.
                          www.mediafire.com/buzzkill - Get your 32x32 tiles here. UT32 now compatible Ironband and Quickband 9/6/2012.
                          My banding life on Buzzkill's ladder.

                          Comment

                          • scud
                            Swordsman
                            • Jan 2011
                            • 323

                            Originally posted by buzzkill
                            Price based squelching if implemented IMO we end up being different, but no better. Trading the set of problems we have now for a slightly different set of problems, yet to be known.
                            But doesn't the prospect of a new set of problems excite you, buzz!?

                            Actually I'd really like the squelch interface to allow me to:

                            a. squelch all armour which doesn't have [user defined] resistance(s)

                            b. squelch all non-missile weapons which don't do at least [user defined] damage to 'others'

                            c. squelch all potions of attribute while I'm at my maximum for that attribute

                            I'd also like the moon. On a stick.

                            Comment

                            • buzzkill
                              Prophet
                              • May 2008
                              • 2939

                              Originally posted by scud
                              But doesn't the prospect of a new set of problems excite you, buzz!?
                              There's something to be said of this and most politicians, which is about all I can say without catching flack. Just an observation.
                              www.mediafire.com/buzzkill - Get your 32x32 tiles here. UT32 now compatible Ironband and Quickband 9/6/2012.
                              My banding life on Buzzkill's ladder.

                              Comment

                              • PowerDiver
                                Prophet
                                • Mar 2008
                                • 2820

                                The problem with DSM squelching is that DSMs are already egos. If you look at them as a generic base, with an ego added that is described by a color, that maps very well onto the system of armors without flags before adding the various armor egos.

                                When you put egos on DSMs, suddenly you change the game to require squelching in the presence of *two* [effective] egos. Things get much more complicated.

                                If you think that the player ought to be able to differentiate between squelch rules for a ring of resist fire and a ring of resist cold, because the base items have different flags, then you ought to think that the player needs to be able to differentiate squelch rules for red DSM vs white DSM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                😀
                                😂
                                🥰
                                😘
                                🤢
                                😎
                                😞
                                😡
                                👍
                                👎