Sil Builds/Challenges/Concepts/Stupid-Ascension-Tricks

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bron
    Knight
    • May 2008
    • 515

    #31
    Ok, I can work with that. It doesn't particularly look possible, but it's worth a shot. One question: suppose I find a {special} item made out of mithril. Do you consider it acceptable to take the item and melt it down to use the mithril to make something else, as long as the original item is never used/wielded? Personally I would say yes, this is ok, but I'd like to hear other's opinions. I would hate to find a mithril corslet and not be able to make use of all that lovely metal. But note in particular that Fenorian lamps are made with mithril. Also, do you consider it ok to wield a silmaril on the way back up? (assuming against all logic you actually make it that far). Again, I would say yes, since that is the goal and point of the game, but it would (sort of) break the no-magic rule.

    I'll think about this after the current competition is over.

    Comment

    • half
      Knight
      • Jan 2009
      • 910

      #32
      Originally posted by debo
      I threw 4 slowness pots at Morgy once and none of them stuck
      That must have amused him no end! Or at least confused him. Who is this elf-lord who has penetrated to the depths of my realm and is throwing bottles of water at me?

      Comment

      • Scatha
        Swordsman
        • Jan 2012
        • 414

        #33
        Originally posted by bron
        Ok, I can work with that. It doesn't particularly look possible, but it's worth a shot. One question: suppose I find a {special} item made out of mithril. Do you consider it acceptable to take the item and melt it down to use the mithril to make something else, as long as the original item is never used/wielded? Personally I would say yes, this is ok, but I'd like to hear other's opinions. I would hate to find a mithril corslet and not be able to make use of all that lovely metal. But note in particular that Fenorian lamps are made with mithril. Also, do you consider it ok to wield a silmaril on the way back up? (assuming against all logic you actually make it that far). Again, I would say yes, since that is the goal and point of the game, but it would (sort of) break the no-magic rule.
        Those both sound fine to me. The list I provided HM with was supposed to be exhaustive (you're right that there are decisions you could make either way: I was trying to make those decisions, as the answer doesn't matter so much so long as everyone treats them the same). You're meant to just ignore the items in game (but you can melt down {special} mithril items if you like).

        Comment

        • Scatha
          Swordsman
          • Jan 2012
          • 414

          #34
          The Melee/Evasion only challenge is a specialisation of:

          The Two-Skill Challenge:
          Only put points into two skills

          I don't believe that this has been done, but I think it could be nicer to establish it as the standard, rather than specifying skills. Then if someone has an imaginative approach, they can go for it.

          The corresponding Four-Skill Challenge has been completed several times, but is still a bit of a restriction. I think the Three-Skill Challenge has only been won with the two Melee/Evasion/Will characters that have been mentioned. It seems like it gives a good balance between restriction and possibilities, though, so perhaps people will explore other possibilities here.

          Comment

          • half
            Knight
            • Jan 2009
            • 910

            #35
            Yes, I like these as 1 skill, 2 skill, 3 skill, 4 skill challenges.

            It can't be too hard to get some 3 skill Stealth thing working. I'd choose Stealth plus Perception and Song (hoping for boots to grant Sprinting).

            Comment

            • Philip
              Knight
              • Jul 2009
              • 909

              #36
              Other possibilities? Perhaps archery could provide one. Stealth/Archery could be viable, so could Archery/Evasion and Archery/Perception.
              EDIT: Would Archery 1 skill challenge be possible?

              Comment

              • HallucinationMushroom
                Knight
                • Apr 2007
                • 785

                #37
                The angband ladder has us listed as a bunch of no-class bums! Ha, but, seriously, I've been tinkering with the idea of piling notable characters (all winners, challenge attempts, etc...) into easily identifiable groups: Such as Morgy killers, winners, character-identity (warrior, smith, polearm specialist, etc...) and indicating if the player entered extra notes. I offer the following as a quick example of what I'm talking about... These are all the 1.1.1 winners that I found when sorting by Sil version number. I grabbed what I considered the core information, and tried to identify the major characteristic the best I could, but I'm obviously not spot-on.

                So, to make a long story short, would anybody find this useful? And, if so, would this be best served by a new forum post that I constantly update and edit? The librarian in me occasionally takes over and I want to catalog, and while usually the ladder is enough, it doesn't indicate class. This wasn't a problem half a year ago when the number of winners to deaths was so low, but now there are pages of winners, and unless I can recall who wielded the double hammer bad ass leggings of awesome, I have to ask or start searching.

                clouded (clouded) Naugrim Nogrod winner *notes

                Warrior

                Grr (HM) Noldor Feanor Morgy-killer

                Warrior

                Wigging (HM) Noldor Fearnor Morgy-killer

                Heavy protection warrior

                Beleg (Psi) Sindar Doriath Morgy-killer

                Archer

                Beleg (Thraalbeast) Sindar Doriath Winner *notes


                Calarad (Ignatius) Noldor Fingolfin Winner

                Archer

                Leanne (jdh) Noldor Fingolfin Winner

                Warrior

                Timid (Psi) Noldor Feanor Morgy Killer *notes

                Smith

                Mech (jdh) Noldor Feanor Winner

                Smith

                Ornulmar (Ignatius) Noldor Finarfin Winner

                Stealth

                Jill (bron) Noldor Feanor Morgy Killer *a few notes

                Polearm specialist - artefactless
                You are on something strange

                Comment

                • HallucinationMushroom
                  Knight
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 785

                  #38
                  Wow, that post is really long... Hmm, if anybody is still interested, perhaps just posting the most interesting or notable characters would suffice... perhaps by player suggestions? I know I have perused a few characters more than once... perhaps just the characters with useful notes or interesting builds?
                  You are on something strange

                  Comment

                  • HugoVirtuoso
                    Veteran
                    • Jan 2012
                    • 1237

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Scatha
                    The Melee/Evasion only challenge is a specialisation of:

                    The Two-Skill Challenge:
                    Only put points into two skills...

                    I think the Three-Skill Challenge has only been won with the two Melee/Evasion/Will characters that have been mentioned.
                    The two-skill challenge is particularly fun. I have yet to win such an attempt. Psi and HM have tried as well. Let's see who is the 1st.

                    AFAIK, me and Psi are the only two players (unless there are others) who have won with Melee/Evasion/Will (and nothing else) as a Three-Skill Challenge (in any Sil version). Psi took it to another level by beating Morgoth down silly. There could be other three-skill challenge winners, aside from Melee/Evasion/Will, but I'm not sure.

                    Originally posted by HallucinationMushroom
                    The angband ladder has us listed as a bunch of no-class bums! Ha, but, seriously, I've been tinkering with the idea of piling notable characters (all winners, challenge attempts, etc...) into easily identifiable groups: Such as Morgy killers, winners, character-identity (warrior, smith, polearm specialist, etc...) and indicating if the player entered extra notes.....

                    So, to make a long story short, would anybody find this useful? And, if so, would this be best served by a new forum post that I constantly update and edit? The librarian in me occasionally takes over and I want to catalog...
                    Seems like a very nice idea, IMO. You (or someone else) could make the topic...or we can post the Sil Hall of Fame and/or Honorable Mentions here . I'd consider some honorable mentions of [A] those who didn't kill Morgoth but won the game with a distinctive playstyle...like Melee/Evasion/Willl as well as [B] those who have brought the crown to the surface, and other types out there. Examples: Myself for [A] and [B] during the pre-1.1 days. Psi qualifies for [B] and he has destroyed Morgoth with only Melee/Evasion/Will already

                    Hall of Fame for recordkeepers:
                    1) 1st player to ever beat Sil...in it's Golden v1.0 release: Satyr (if I'm not mistaken)
                    2) Sil's current #1 player: WildKhaine
                    3) Highest EXP points upon winning: Ignatius with 130,197
                    4) Won game AND killed Morgoth in few game turns: WildKhaine with only 9,341 game turns
                    4) Won game AND killed Morgoth with polearm-master + no artifacts: bron
                    5) Won game with only Melee/Evasion/Will: HugoTheGreat2011, Psi
                    7) Won game AND took crown to surface: HugoTheGreat2011 (done twice), Psi

                    Honorable mentions:
                    1) Attempted only Melee/Evasion: HugoTheGreat2011, HM, Psi (Let us know if anyone else has gotten far with this...)
                    2) Attempted only Stealth/Song: clouded
                    3) Tends to play two-handed weapons and Melee/Evasion/Will: HugoTheGreat2011

                    Looks like I'm bragging about myself (LOL at #3 in Honorable Mentions). But, knowing who has distinctive playstyles and won (or will win) in such a way is pretty cool and definitely noteworthy for the Sil record books.
                    Last edited by HugoVirtuoso; February 13, 2013, 23:51. Reason: Add comments about 2/3-skill challenges and honorable mentions...cleaning up post as more ideas come
                    My best try at PosChengband 7.0.0's nightmare-mode on Angband.live:
                    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwAR0WOphUA

                    If I'm offline I'm probably in the middle of maintaining Gentoo or something-Linux or other.

                    As of February 18th, 2022, my YouTube username is MidgardVirtuoso

                    Comment

                    • Philip
                      Knight
                      • Jul 2009
                      • 909

                      #40
                      I still dare you guys to do an only archery run.

                      Comment

                      • clouded
                        Swordsman
                        • Jun 2012
                        • 268

                        #41
                        Originally posted by Philip
                        I still dare you guys to do an only archery run.
                        Sounds kind of unfun before you find a bow, which could be a while. Lots of the challenges have little (or not so little) things like this that make them a bit painful.

                        I must mention what I've been toiling over for several months: Win a steathless Edain. Maybe I don't have the right strategy or I just suck, but I simply cannot manage it. If they had innate 1 con it would be so much more doable.

                        Comment

                        • Philip
                          Knight
                          • Jul 2009
                          • 909

                          #42
                          Actually, if you're only investing in archery, you still have versatility. I also wouldn't be against just giving yourself a bow and arrows.

                          Comment

                          • HallucinationMushroom
                            Knight
                            • Apr 2007
                            • 785

                            #43
                            Okay cool, less work for me, I didn't get much positive feedback about my character piling idea. Sorry Hugo, we know enough about where to poke around that it wouldn't really be worth the effort!

                            That being said, I think the ladder actually does a pretty good job of sorting quality characters by score, since the formula is complex. If it doesn't already, perhaps a score boost to edain characters, but I really don't care about score.
                            I mainly just wanted to make a useful resource of character builds to quickly explore, not so much to celebrate individual players.
                            You are on something strange

                            Comment

                            • Psi
                              Knight
                              • Apr 2007
                              • 870

                              #44
                              Originally posted by HallucinationMushroom
                              Okay cool, less work for me, I didn't get much positive feedback about my character piling idea.
                              I actually think it was a good idea, deserving of a sticky thread (dare I say it). However IMHO what it would need is a list of build types and then links to the strongest ladder characters who typify that build.

                              Comment

                              • HallucinationMushroom
                                Knight
                                • Apr 2007
                                • 785

                                #45
                                I thought this was in the same-enough-vein as my original thread idea, but I feel like it's starting to veer into needing it's own thread, and I'll make a new thread based on the number of replies I get to this...

                                If you think you own an exemplary example of a particular build, pm me the ladder link and tell me what identity it is, and I'll start to compile. That takes some of the work off me and keeps from hurting people's feeling through exclusion based on my own ignorance. Try to be somewhat concise about the primary concept or identity: stealth-stabber, smith, pacifist, etc... For myself, I self-identify with high protection warriors so I will probably include my best example, and perhaps my 3 challenges character, though I imagine somebody has done it better than me by now.

                                Only send characters that would make good learning examples. They don't have to be the most successful, or have extra notes (those help) just ones you wouldn't mind people cribbing. Getting extreme lucky early drops alter usefulness, for example.

                                And, I'll leave this idea at that. If I get enough pm's I'll take it to the next step and try to include characters who ought to belong but weren't pm'd and then possibly make the new thread if the final product actually looks useful.

                                Edit: Oh, and game version matters too. If an essential part of the build is rather broken based on game version (i.e. smithing costs), let's simply ignore it for the sake of current usefulness.
                                You are on something strange

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                😀
                                😂
                                🥰
                                😘
                                🤢
                                😎
                                😞
                                😡
                                👍
                                👎