[Announce] Poschengband 3.2.0 Released

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • chris
    PosChengband Maintainer
    • Jan 2008
    • 702

    #76
    Originally posted by krazyhades
    I think message code clean-up is part of Nick's vision for the Vanilla code restructure, but that's neither here nor there.
    Well, since Hengband has already missed 15 years of the latest code cleanups, then missing this new one will hardly matter

    (There is still code that assumes a 16 bit machine architecture! Or at least there was until recently ...)

    Comment

    • Nick
      Vanilla maintainer
      • Apr 2007
      • 9637

      #77
      Originally posted by chris
      Well, since Hengband has already missed 15 years of the latest code cleanups, then missing this new one will hardly matter

      (There is still code that assumes a 16 bit machine architecture! Or at least there was until recently ...)
      Interestingly, my latest coding has involved (roughly) copying the PosCheng body template idea.

      The new V codebase is intended to be very variant-friendly, but nonetheless I suspect rewriting PosCheng to use it would put a dent in even your output
      One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne
      In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.

      Comment

      Working...
      😀
      😂
      🥰
      😘
      🤢
      😎
      😞
      😡
      👍
      👎