I appreciate the diplomacy and genuineness, but would be happier still for a maybe less diplomatic but more informative response. You say my playthrough was helpful - in which way ?
You intend, if I understand correctly, for shapes to not be increasingly superior ways for applying melee damage, but rather niche solutions to specific problems.
If that is so, there must exist a reason to leave a given shape, besides the global "you cant use magic while shapeshifted" that applies to all shapes. In the case of the fox, I can see the possibility for such a design if the fox damage output is actually lower than unshifted. The druid would turn into a fox for a stealth bonus while exploring and unshift for combat. While a speed bonus is thematic, it directly affects damage, so if you insist on including it, maybe remove all attack abilities from fox.
Leaving the bear aside for now, what would be a reason to use pukelman ? And what would be one to stop using it ?
If the reason for pukelman and fox is not superior damage, then you need to make sure that those forms actually do less damage than whatever you intend for the default druid combat - probably the spells (?). That is not "just balance", it has to be in the right ballpark otherwise the niche concept breaks apart.
Currently, I dont have much time for Angband either, but I will try and stay on track as much as possible.
You intend, if I understand correctly, for shapes to not be increasingly superior ways for applying melee damage, but rather niche solutions to specific problems.
If that is so, there must exist a reason to leave a given shape, besides the global "you cant use magic while shapeshifted" that applies to all shapes. In the case of the fox, I can see the possibility for such a design if the fox damage output is actually lower than unshifted. The druid would turn into a fox for a stealth bonus while exploring and unshift for combat. While a speed bonus is thematic, it directly affects damage, so if you insist on including it, maybe remove all attack abilities from fox.
Leaving the bear aside for now, what would be a reason to use pukelman ? And what would be one to stop using it ?
If the reason for pukelman and fox is not superior damage, then you need to make sure that those forms actually do less damage than whatever you intend for the default druid combat - probably the spells (?). That is not "just balance", it has to be in the right ballpark otherwise the niche concept breaks apart.
Currently, I dont have much time for Angband either, but I will try and stay on track as much as possible.
Comment