First rogue past level 10 I think

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Petoften
    Knight
    • Jun 2018
    • 566

    #31
    Originally posted by Ingwe Ingweron
    Rod of Recall is a special rod, it is immune to fire and electrical damage, i.e., it can't be destroyed. However, like anything in @'s pack, it can be stolen until @ DEX is high enough to prevent stealing, so be careful around other thieves.
    Good info. What DEX is needed for that? I'm at about 18/113.

    Getting stranded deep in the dungeon because your rogue's rod of recall was stolen would be kind of poetic though.
    Cute. Think I'll try it... no items stolen so far and I could get it back, right...

    Comment

    • Petoften
      Knight
      • Jun 2018
      • 566

      #32
      When an artifact is 'disenchanted', does that only reduce the stats like armor/damage/tohit, or can it remove things like protections?

      Comment

      • Pete Mack
        Prophet
        • Apr 2007
        • 6697

        #33
        18/150 DEX prevents stealing, but 18/110 is high enough that the odds of successful theft are very low. There is really only one thief that is remotely a problem for you.

        And no: accuracy rings are not worth keeping. There are too many other valuable things to use ring slots for. The only tone i use them is as a high level mage or priest who needs experience fast.

        Comment

        • Petoften
          Knight
          • Jun 2018
          • 566

          #34
          In a sort of vault with lots of stuff I'm sneaking around. Lines of creatures. I'm inside about 10 squares from the door with a lot of monsters close by.

          A disenchanting unique is just above blocked by a line of things, but when I go to look at an item it lets him start moving to me. I only have a few turns.

          There are some unknown potions I want and an unknown scroll and I have a full inventory.

          To make room I decide to read the scroll - it likely won't be an issue, the main one that would would be aggravate monster.

          Guess what it was.
          Last edited by Petoften; August 9, 2018, 01:46.

          Comment

          • Petoften
            Knight
            • Jun 2018
            • 566

            #35
            Hm, I have to pick a cloak with 2 stealth and resist sound, or a cloak with resist poison and other things.

            Comment

            • Petoften
              Knight
              • Jun 2018
              • 566

              #36
              Went from 28000 gold to 9000 mostly from selling two unknown potions to identify them and rebuying them when they were STR and CON.

              Comment

              • Petoften
                Knight
                • Jun 2018
                • 566

                #37
                An amulet of searching, even +6, is not worth keeping except when you have nothing more useful, right? Searching bonuses don't seem very useful.

                Comment

                • fph
                  Knight
                  • Apr 2009
                  • 956

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Petoften
                  Went from 28000 gold to 9000 mostly from selling two unknown potions to identify them and rebuying them when they were STR and CON.
                  It's safe (and more fun) to drink potions to find out what they are, rather than selling them. Just make sure you're in a safe situation with no monsters around (in case it's confusion/poison); the worst thing that could happen to you is a +1/-1 potion draining a precious point in the wrong stat.

                  The same applies to wands, staves, and scrolls (better to read scrolls on the stairs in case it's summon monsters; the worst thing that could happen is deep descent).

                  Bottom line: this advice does not apply to liquids you find in real life.
                  --
                  Dive fast, die young, leave a high-CHA corpse.

                  Comment

                  • Pete Mack
                    Prophet
                    • Apr 2007
                    • 6697

                    #39
                    In a vault, there are a number of bad scrolls besides aggravate:
                    * Destruction
                    * Tele Level
                    * Deep Descent.
                    * summoning (various sorts)
                    Also light, but there is almost no chance of running across this unIDed at depth.

                    Comment

                    • Petoften
                      Knight
                      • Jun 2018
                      • 566

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Pete Mack
                      In a vault, there are a number of bad scrolls besides aggravate:
                      * Destruction
                      * Tele Level
                      * Deep Descent.
                      * summoning (various sorts)
                      Also light, but there is almost no chance of running across this unIDed at depth.
                      Oh, agreed. I've already run across others - though I hadn't heard of destruction. What's that?

                      And ya, I did a light in a room and aggroed a bunch of stuff, I think I was using an unidentified staff of starlight or something.

                      I read a 'mass banishment' and pretty much wasted it, and a tele level and lost the level I was on.

                      Sometimes it's tricky to travel to stairs, but I eventually did and got out of that level IIRC.

                      Comment

                      • Mondkalb
                        Knight
                        • Apr 2007
                        • 891

                        #41
                        Scrolls of destruction and *destruction* destroy everything in a wide circle around the player similar to the staff of earthquakes and the priest spell.
                        My Angband winners so far

                        My FAangband efforts so far

                        Comment

                        • Petoften
                          Knight
                          • Jun 2018
                          • 566

                          #42
                          Another interesting choice - weapon with 3 stealth and 'adds to regeneration' and one with telepathy.

                          I've picked telepathy.

                          Does that regeneration stack with an amulet of regeneration?

                          I'd carry both but the former adds 15 pounds.

                          Comment

                          • Pete Mack
                            Prophet
                            • Apr 2007
                            • 6697

                            #43
                            Regen doesn't stack, no. ESP is a no brainer for a swap weapon. You may want to carry a different one with more damage for fighting serious enemies.

                            Comment

                            • Ingwe Ingweron
                              Veteran
                              • Jan 2009
                              • 2110

                              #44
                              Originally posted by Pete Mack
                              And no: accuracy rings are not worth keeping. There are too many other valuable things to use ring slots for. The only tone i use them is as a high level mage or priest who needs experience fast.
                              I would add Ranger to the list of classes that find Accuracy rings useful. Especially a ranger that is relying on missiles far more than melee. Damage rings are less useful, in that case, and accuracy may have more value. Also, even for other classes, an early accuracy ring is more valuable than most of the other rings you may come across. If not Speed, Damage, Slaying, or a special case need of fire, cold, poison resistance or see invisible, I would tend to favor Accuracy over pretty much every other non-artifact ring.
                              “We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see.”
                              ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead

                              Comment

                              • Petoften
                                Knight
                                • Jun 2018
                                • 566

                                #45
                                Oops - brain fart - I'm playing a hobbit ranger, not a hobbit rogue.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                😀
                                😂
                                🥰
                                😘
                                🤢
                                😎
                                😞
                                😡
                                👍
                                👎