An argument for Temporary Resist indicators to also be shown when @ has immunity.
When @ acquires a standard resistance, there is no indicator on the screen, and that seems fine. Players should be trying to cover the standard resistances in the ordinary course. When @ has a temporary resist, an indicator is shown on the screen. This also seems reasonable and helpful as player may need to know a resist is covered (especially double resisted) when deciding to go into certain fights. In my opinion, immunity should also cause the temporary resist indicator to be shown. It seems to me that (1) immunity is inclusive of the temporary resist, and (2) I forget that the resist is covered and waste time, spells or consumables to double resist when it is absolutely unnecessary.
When @ acquires a standard resistance, there is no indicator on the screen, and that seems fine. Players should be trying to cover the standard resistances in the ordinary course. When @ has a temporary resist, an indicator is shown on the screen. This also seems reasonable and helpful as player may need to know a resist is covered (especially double resisted) when deciding to go into certain fights. In my opinion, immunity should also cause the temporary resist indicator to be shown. It seems to me that (1) immunity is inclusive of the temporary resist, and (2) I forget that the resist is covered and waste time, spells or consumables to double resist when it is absolutely unnecessary.
Comment