Squelching

[takkaria]

In that case I'd rather 'k' be destroy, and 'K' be destroy with the option to squelch in the future (or whatever the recent change is). As long as somehow I can get back the standard 'k' destroy functionality I know and love!

The item squelch settings menu is there for a reason.

In my opinion this new change to 'k' is something that seems like a good idea, but when you're actually playing and "Ignore X in future [y/n]" messages pop up every time you destroy something, it becomes really annoying fast.

Interesting! I find quite the opposite, since I hate squelch menus. I guess this is option territory.

[Nick]

Interesting! I find quite the opposite, since I hate squelch menus. I guess this is option territory.

You realise that, with your sig, that's quite contradictory?

[takkaria]

You realise that, with your sig, that's quite contradictory?

I just look like someone who can't make up their mind. Which is true in this case, really.

[zaimoni]

Yeah, I'm not sure what squelching does without hide_squelchable any more - anything?. At the time I hacked it in it was a proof-of-concept, which is why it was optional.

Agreed, the option should default to on.

I do want the option, though: being able to turn off squelch temporarily when running low on supplies to get second-rate substitutes, is a reasonable tactic.

[buzzkill]

In that case I'd rather 'k' be destroy, and 'K' be destroy with the option to squelch in the future (or whatever the recent change is).

Sounds like a winner to me. k=destroy, K=destroy+squelch.

[PowerDiver]

You realise that, with your sig, that's quite contradictory?

So long as it is someone else who adds the option, it is only slightly contradictory.