I guess I was imagining something more like:
"Buying: 5 Potions of See Invisible
You already have 4 of this item.
How many do you want?
___"
Just to make it a bit clearer about what you're actually buying...
Also I just found the following bugs after running around a bit:
1. I just hit a teleport trap and the panel didn't shift to show the @ until I moved around a bit.
2. Nomad's tiles should be 8x16, not 16x16.
3. When you try to read/quaff etc. the letters displayed next to the items are not the letters used for the slot they're in - e.g. if you have scrolls in slots c and d, pressing 'r' will say "Read which scroll? (c-d)" but the actual menu tags will be a and b.
PS Having Shockbolt's tiles working properly is amazing!
					"Buying: 5 Potions of See Invisible
You already have 4 of this item.
How many do you want?
___"
Just to make it a bit clearer about what you're actually buying...
Also I just found the following bugs after running around a bit:
1. I just hit a teleport trap and the panel didn't shift to show the @ until I moved around a bit.
2. Nomad's tiles should be 8x16, not 16x16.
3. When you try to read/quaff etc. the letters displayed next to the items are not the letters used for the slot they're in - e.g. if you have scrolls in slots c and d, pressing 'r' will say "Read which scroll? (c-d)" but the actual menu tags will be a and b.
PS Having Shockbolt's tiles working properly is amazing!
 
	
 
							
						 The comment in main-gcu.c mentions that its the case on AIX? I don't know about AIX, but on Debian 8 <term.h> does define struct term. There is a bit of preprocessor hackery in main-gcu.c to deal with that, which, I suspect, breaks strict aliasing? (pedantry...) Maybe it would be better to rename Angband's term to angband_term.
 The comment in main-gcu.c mentions that its the case on AIX? I don't know about AIX, but on Debian 8 <term.h> does define struct term. There is a bit of preprocessor hackery in main-gcu.c to deal with that, which, I suspect, breaks strict aliasing? (pedantry...) Maybe it would be better to rename Angband's term to angband_term.
Comment