Support for Acorn and other old systems. Status?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CJNyfalt
    Swordsman
    • May 2007
    • 289

    Support for Acorn and other old systems. Status?

    Have Acorn support been thrown out from Vanilla? Which other systems have had their support removed?
    Has the support for the following all been removed or has it been moved to another file?:
    - main-acn - Acorn
    - main-cap - Termcap
    - main-dos - DOS
    - main-emx - OS/2
    - main-ibm - DOS, another version
    - main-lsl - Linux SVGAlib
    - main-mac - Old macs
    - main-sla - SLang
    - main-vme - VM/ESA IBM mainframes
    - main-xaw - X11 with Xaw widgets
  • zaimoni
    Knight
    • Apr 2007
    • 590

    #2
    They're all gone, yes.
    Zaiband: end the "I shouldn't have survived that" experience. V3.0.6 fork on Hg.
    Zaiband 3.0.10 ETA Mar. 7 2011 (Yes, schedule slipped. Latest testing indicates not enough assert() calls to allow release.)
    Z.C++: pre-alpha C/C++ compiler system (usable preprocessor). Also on Hg. Z.C++ 0.0.10 ETA December 31 2011

    Comment

    • CJNyfalt
      Swordsman
      • May 2007
      • 289

      #3
      Good, that will help cleaning up code.

      Comment

      • K.I.L.E.R
        Apprentice
        • May 2007
        • 56

        #4
        I am not happy about this. I am still fighting to get support for the Z80.

        Comment

        • takkaria
          Veteran
          • Apr 2007
          • 1951

          #5
          We support Windows, OS X, SDL, X11, GTK and NCurses now, that's it. GTK support is going to be dropped soon, too.
          takkaria whispers something about options. -more-

          Comment

          • d_m
            Angband Devteam member
            • Aug 2008
            • 1517

            #6
            Originally posted by K.I.L.E.R
            I am not happy about this. I am still fighting to get support for the Z80.
            My sense is that if anyone wants to maintain a platform (in terms of testing code on it and updating the port-specific code as needed) then we'll add/keep it. None of the current devs could test the code in question that we removed, and we didn't know of anyone else who could.
            linux->xterm->screen->pmacs

            Comment

            • CJNyfalt
              Swordsman
              • May 2007
              • 289

              #7
              Originally posted by takkaria
              We support Windows, OS X, SDL, X11, GTK and NCurses now, that's it. GTK support is going to be dropped soon, too.
              Hmm.
              Let's lift the cat on the table and discuss NCurses a bit. Has Angband reached a point where support for that port is starting to restrict the rest too much? The rest of the ports are after all graphical and allows for a much more flexible display setup.

              Comment

              • takkaria
                Veteran
                • Apr 2007
                • 1951

                #8
                Originally posted by CJNyfalt
                Hmm.
                Let's lift the cat on the table and discuss NCurses a bit. Has Angband reached a point where support for that port is starting to restrict the rest too much? The rest of the ports are after all graphical and allows for a much more flexible display setup.
                Nope. Plain terminal support is something that I'd consider essential to Angband. I've no problem with other ports doing stuff above-and-beyond that, but support for the plain terminal should always be there.
                takkaria whispers something about options. -more-

                Comment

                • konijn_
                  Hellband maintainer
                  • Jul 2007
                  • 367

                  #9
                  Originally posted by takkaria
                  Nope. Plain terminal support is something that I'd consider essential to Angband. I've no problem with other ports doing stuff above-and-beyond that, but support for the plain terminal should always be there.
                  +1. Especially if you want to offer Angband over telnet for competitions and stuff.

                  T.
                  * Are you ready for something else ? Hellband 0.8.8 is out! *

                  Comment

                  • Max Stats
                    Swordsman
                    • Jun 2010
                    • 324

                    #10
                    Originally posted by takkaria
                    Nope. Plain terminal support is something that I'd consider essential to Angband. I've no problem with other ports doing stuff above-and-beyond that, but support for the plain terminal should always be there.
                    I'm glad to hear this. I think a lot of the dyed-in-the-wool players play this way.
                    If beauty is in the eye of the beholder, then why are beholders so freaking ugly?

                    Comment

                    • d_m
                      Angband Devteam member
                      • Aug 2008
                      • 1517

                      #11
                      As a screen junkie I certainly require the GCU port.

                      That said, I don't object to refactoring Angband so that other ports get cool features that GCU can't have (e.g. a map command that draws pixels to give a topographically-accurate minimap) and I don't want the GCU port to "block" those features.

                      But I think being able to play Angband in screen over SSH on my headless Linux server is important!

                      That said, I know enough about ncurses to sort of hate it, so I could imagine rewriting the "terminal-based" client to strip ncurses out. (Actually it's more accurate to say I periodically fantasize about this.)
                      linux->xterm->screen->pmacs

                      Comment

                      • K.I.L.E.R
                        Apprentice
                        • May 2007
                        • 56

                        #12
                        Sorry, I should mention that I was joking, no one noticed that I mentioned the Z80.

                        Comment

                        • Magnate
                          Angband Devteam member
                          • May 2007
                          • 5110

                          #13
                          Originally posted by K.I.L.E.R
                          Sorry, I should mention that I was joking, no one noticed that I mentioned the Z80.
                          I was with you. I was going to make some geek response about the 8088 and the 6502, but decided not to give Nick any more ammunition.
                          "Been away so long I hardly knew the place, gee it's good to be back home" - The Beatles

                          Comment

                          • Nick
                            Vanilla maintainer
                            • Apr 2007
                            • 9637

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Magnate
                            I was with you. I was going to make some geek response about the 8088 and the 6502, but decided not to give Nick any more ammunition.
                            magnate is a geek lol
                            One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne
                            In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.

                            Comment

                            • Philip
                              Knight
                              • Jul 2009
                              • 909

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Nick
                              magnate is a geek lol
                              magnate~~ iz ruining the game eeeeeeeeeee~~~~~~
                              lol disconnect stairs is stupid~~eeeeee
                              why magnate ruin game with personal mission?????
                              ~~~~plz no~ rage lol~~~~~~~~ eeeeee
                              (taking it to the next level)

                              P.S.: Is dos350 real? The best argument for the he is real argument is that he doesn't grasp basic concepts or even what the discussion is about.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              😀
                              😂
                              🥰
                              😘
                              🤢
                              😎
                              😞
                              😡
                              👍
                              👎