IDE's and contributions
Collapse
X
-
I don't think so. A reputable source in 1993 told me he "knew someone" who did it, and he knew I knew who Stallman was so he would have used that name. It wasn't "friend of a friend", but I don't remember a name [or even whether he told me the name] so I can't be 100% sure it wasn't made up.Comment
-
I can't stand emacs, I should learn it but I had a CS prof. Who was obcessed with it and gave exams over emacs commands (it was a comp. Architecture class) He ruined it for me, but I suppose I *should* still try and learn, at least for SLIME.
Notepad ftw though.Comment
-
the biggest problem I have with emacs is that the default shortcut for delete or cut is the same as close window in firefox...
I've actually lost some fairly long posts on this forum because of that...Comment
-
Ask yourself though, is that Emacs' problem or firefox's?
I think a good text editor is more important than a good web browser but that's just me. Also FWIW I don't use Emacs right now.Comment
-
You know you're a dinosaur if ...
You remember when "Eight Megs And Constantly Swapping" was true and funny.Comment
-
OK, so here's a related question. I've been doing my windows compiles using msys and mingw, which has worked fine with main-win.c and Makefile.win. Now, if I understand correctly, something similar can be done to compile using SDL for windows, basically by replacing main-win.c by main-sdl.c. But I'm having a lot of trouble getting the various SDL libraries (a) compiled and (b) in the right place.
So I'm looking for advice, especially advice that doesn't involve using some IDE
One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.Comment
-
I hadn't - and being old enough to remember Eddie's joke, my favourite bit was the size of the emacs executable.Everyone has probably seen this already, but it *is* the final word on editors:
http://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/ed.msg"Been away so long I hardly knew the place, gee it's good to be back home" - The BeatlesComment
-
Somehow that reminded me of something funny about maybe "real programmers"? All I remember is some offhand comment about putting the instructions or maybe the data in precise locations on the drum so that instead of fetching you read directly based on the time the drum spun between instructions. Any idea what I am talking about?Everyone has probably seen this already, but it *is* the final word on editors:
http://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/ed.msgComment
-
Yeah, I read that. It would be more than 15 years ago. It think it started by saying something about how people say that real programmers use fortran (or maybe assembler), then described this guy who used ISTR a bunch of tricks based on hardware, and the one about the drum was kind of the punchline. I have no idea where I read it though.Somehow that reminded me of something funny about maybe "real programmers"? All I remember is some offhand comment about putting the instructions or maybe the data in precise locations on the drum so that instead of fetching you read directly based on the time the drum spun between instructions. Any idea what I am talking about?One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.Comment
-
"You hit Morgoth, Lord of Darkness. You have slain Morgoth, Lord of Darkness. Congratulations, you have won the game. The Great Wyrm of Balance breathes chaos. You die."Comment
-
Are you cross-compiling or doing it on Windows itself?OK, so here's a related question. I've been doing my windows compiles using msys and mingw, which has worked fine with main-win.c and Makefile.win. Now, if I understand correctly, something similar can be done to compile using SDL for windows, basically by replacing main-win.c by main-sdl.c. But I'm having a lot of trouble getting the various SDL libraries (a) compiled and (b) in the right place.
So I'm looking for advice, especially advice that doesn't involve using some IDE
takkaria whispers something about options. -more-Comment
Comment