Wikipedia seems to do best on completely noncontrovertial subjects. So, while I expect their article on Star * gets vandalized weekly and their article on the BNP gets vandalized daily their article on, say, medieval weaponry is halfway decent. Except the polearms part, which is hopelessly balkanized. Okay, bad example.
Generally any field that hasn't changed for several decades is probably okay.
Generally any field that hasn't changed for several decades is probably okay.
Comment