Gear issues

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pete Mack
    Prophet
    • Apr 2007
    • 6883

    Gear issues

    I've said it before: gear in 3.5 and later is too reliably good. I am in the endgame of a 3.4 game on my phone. I have collected masses of Healing potions, via mobs and pits (dragon and maiar.) But my equipment is far worse than any of my games on more recent builds. And I still don't have sustains or res disenchantment.

    Code:
    [Character Equipment]
    
    a) a Scythe of Slicing of Extra Attacks (8d4) (+9,+13) <+2>
         Dropped by an Ancient green dragon at 4250 feet (level 85).
         475 damage/round 
    b) a Short Bow of Lothlorien (x3) (+13,+23) <+3, +1>
         Bought from a store.
    c) a Ring of Speed <+13>
         Found lying on the floor in a vault at 3950' (level 79).
    d) a Ring of Damage (+0,+13)
    e) the Necklace of the Dwarves <+3, +5, +1>
         Found lying on the floor in a vault at 4550 feet (level 91).
    f) the Star of Elendil <+3> (charging)
         Found lying on the floor in a vault at 4250 feet (level 85).
    g) Green Dragon Scale Mail (Dwarven) (-2) [20,+30] <+2, +4>
         Found lying on the floor at 3000 feet (level 60).
    h) the Cloak 'Colluin' [1,+15]
         Dropped by an Ancient gold dragon at 4250 feet (level 85).
    i) the Wicker Shield of Elros [2,+20] <+4, +1>
         Dropped by a Dark elven priest at 4550 feet (level 91).
    j) the Hard Leather Cap of Thranduil [2,+10] <+2>
         Dropped by Ar-PharazĂ´n the Golden at 3700 feet (level 74).  
    k) a Set of Mithril Gauntlets of Combat (+1,+4) [6,+16] <+1, +2>
         Found lying on the floor in a vault at 4550 feet (level 91).
    l) a Pair of Steel Shod Boots of Speed [7,+9] <+7>
         Dropped by a Scout at 3450 feet (level 69).
  • luneya
    Swordsman
    • Aug 2015
    • 279

    #2
    What are you talking about? That equipment set looks pretty darned good to me. So you don't have sustains or rDis. Who cares? There are plenty of common swap items you can use for sustains as needed, and rDis is very much a luxury ability. You can't fight the Tarrasque with this gear, but it should be adequate against Morgy.

    Comment

    • Philip
      Knight
      • Jul 2009
      • 909

      #3
      I believe Pete Mack is making the reverse point to the one you inferred. That this gear is perfectly fine, but that gear in newer versions is broken and too powerful and too easy to get. This seems to be largely confirmed by the newest batch of stats.

      Comment

      • Grotug
        Veteran
        • Nov 2013
        • 1637

        #4
        Taken from my current HT/Warrior, Galdo the Superior

        3 best immunities,
        all resistances (including pStun) except rDark, rNether and pConf.
        600+ dam to everyone. 1075 to demons and undead, 975 to dragons (with two swaps).

        Code:
        [Character Equipment]
        
        a) a Scythe of Slicing of Extra Attacks (8d4) (+11,+18) <+2>
             Found lying on the floor in a vault at 4300 feet (level 86)
             
             +2 attack speed.
             
             Combat info:
             7.5 blows/round.
             Average damage/round: 602.4.
             
        b) the Long Bow of Garianath (x4) (+16,+28) <+3, +1>
             Dropped by a dread at 2100 feet (level 42)
             
             +3 dexterity.
             +3 searching skill.
             +1 shooting power.
             Provides resistance to acid, poison.
             Cannot be harmed by acid, fire.
             Grants the ability to see invisible things.  
             
             When activated, it disables traps, unlocks doors and reveals all
             secret doors in a given direction.
             Takes 176 to 195 turns to recharge at your current speed.
             Your chance of success is 90.0%
             
        c) a Ring of Speed <+15>
             Found lying on the floor in a vault at 4250 feet (level 85)
             
             +15 speed.
             
        d) the Ring of Numion [+28] <+4, +5, +2, +1>
             Found lying on the floor in a vault at 4050 feet (level 81)
             
             +4 intelligence.
             +5 dexterity.
             +2 constitution.
             +1 light.
             Provides immunity to acid, fire.
             Provides resistance to lightning, sound, chaos, disenchantment.
             Provides protection from fear, blindness.
             Cannot be harmed by lightning.
             Slows your metabolism.  Speeds regeneration.  Grants telepathy. 
             Prevents paralysis.  
             
             When activated, it grants temporary resistance to acid,
             electricity, fire, cold and poison for 1d20+20 turns.
             Takes 254 to 310 turns to recharge at your current speed.
             Your chance of success is 84.5%
             
        e) an Amulet of Trickery <+3, +5, +4, +2>
             Dropped by The Mouth of Sauron at 4300 feet (level 86)
             
             +3 dexterity.
             +3 stealth.
             +5 searching skill.
             +4 infravision.
             +2 speed.
             Provides resistance to poison, nexus.
             Sustains dexterity.
             
        f) the Star of Deleguino <+3>
             Dropped by Lorgan, Chief of the Easterlings at 1900 feet (level
             38)
             
             +3 light.
             Cannot be harmed by fire.
             Slows your metabolism.  Prevents paralysis.  Sustains your life
             force.  
             Radius 3 light.
             
             When activated, it maps the area around you.
             Takes 158 to 310 turns to recharge at your current speed.
             Your chance of success is 92.4%
             
        g) Adamantite Plate Mail (Dwarven) (-4) [80,+24] <+2, +4>
             Found lying on the floor in a vault at 4250 feet (level 85)
             
             +2 strength.
             +2 constitution.
             +4 infravision.
             Cannot be harmed by acid.
             Prevents paralysis.  
             
        h) an Elven Cloak of Aman [6,+32] <+3, +1>
             Found lying on the floor in a vault at 4300 feet (level 86)
             
             +3 stealth.
             +1 speed.
             Provides resistance to dark.
             Cannot be harmed by acid, fire.
             
        i) a Small Metal Shield (Dwarven) (+3,+4) [5,+18] <+1, +2>
             Found lying on the floor in a vault at 4300 feet (level 86)
             
             +1 strength.
             +2 constitution.
             Cannot be harmed by acid.
             Prevents paralysis.  
             
        j) the Jewel Encrusted Crown of Moreth [0,+12] <+4>
             Found lying on the floor in a vault at 4300 feet (level 86)
             
             +4 strength.
             +4 intelligence.
             Provides immunity to cold.
             Provides resistance to nexus.
             Provides protection from fear.
             Cannot be harmed by acid.
             Grants the ability to see invisible things.  
             
             When activated, it grants temporary resistance to poison for
             1d10+10 turns.
             Takes 102 to 111 turns to recharge at your current speed.
             Your chance of success is 93.0%
             
        k) the Set of Caestus 'Belvair' (+2,+11) [5,+12] <+1>
             Dropped by a Blue Wizard at 4250 feet (level 85)
             
             +1 intelligence.
             Provides resistance to cold, light.
             Cannot be harmed by acid, fire.
             Grants the ability to see invisible things.  Prevents paralysis.  
             
        l) the Pair of Steel Shod Boots 'Anielin' [7,+14] <+5, +3, +7>
             Dropped by Atlas, the Titan at 3600 feet (level 72)
             
             +5 intelligence.
             +3 dexterity.
             +7 speed.
             Provides resistance to disenchantment.
             Provides protection from stunning.
             Cannot be harmed by acid, fire.
             Sustains wisdom.
             
             When activated, it heals 1200 hit points, cut damage, and cures
             stunning, poisoning, blindness, and confusion.
             Takes 455 to 613 turns to recharge at your current speed.
             Your chance of success is 87.0%
        Beginner's Guide to Angband 4.2.3 Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9c9e2wMngM

        Detailed account of my Ironman win here.

        "My guess is that Grip and Fang have many more kills than Gothmog and Lungorthin." --Fizzix

        Comment

        • Pete Mack
          Prophet
          • Apr 2007
          • 6883

          #5
          @Philip: correct. Yes, I can fight Sauron and M with that gear--it is indeed good enough, despite the lack of sustains. (That amulet of sustenance has really helped.) But it is much worse than a similar character in 4.1 would have. Almost no high resists except poison, and short on CON with any suitable gear for M or S. And it was much more challenging just getting there.

          Comment

          • Pete Mack
            Prophet
            • Apr 2007
            • 6883

            #6
            @Grotug--much of the difference in character power is randarts vs standarts. But even with standarts, a 4.1 character would be stronger.

            Comment

            • PowerWyrm
              Prophet
              • Apr 2008
              • 2986

              #7
              Randarts in latest version are absurdely powerful. Check my comp 216 characters: 8d8 lance with +2ea, "bands" with +all stats/speed/resists/immunities, shield with +2ea, boots of +14 speed...

              The two main problems here are:
              - randarts based off anything
              - extra shots/blows on anything (less important for shots when the new +spr is ported to master)

              I never had a problem with randarts in older versions when they were based off regular ones.
              PWMAngband variant maintainer - check https://github.com/draconisPW/PWMAngband (or http://www.mangband.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=9) to learn more about this new variant!

              Comment

              • Pete Mack
                Prophet
                • Apr 2007
                • 6883

                #8
                Just cleared a checkerboard vault in 3.4 at dl 95. Lots of ego items, but few of them good. In 4.x, there would be no *slay orc* weapons or res cold armor. This makes a huge difference in the amount of actually useful stuff--i suspect it is the single most unbalancing feature of v3.5 and later.

                Also: what does '/' represent in vault.txt? It doesn't show in the comments at the beginning.

                Comment

                • Nick
                  Vanilla maintainer
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 9637

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Pete Mack
                  Also: what does '/' represent in vault.txt? It doesn't show in the comments at the beginning.
                  I did some aligning of V and FA vault encoding, as they were different (I first found this out when I brought V vaults into FA and they were full of mushrooms...). This enabled me to just pull all the FA vaults in, but in the interests of retaining compatibility I kept water and tree grids. So '/' would be water and ';' would be tree, but they are just floor in V.
                  One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne
                  In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.

                  Comment

                  • fizzix
                    Prophet
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 3025

                    #10
                    I think we have a lot of information from stats and observation that the current version 4.x including 4.feature is too generous with drops and a bit light on danger. In some sense this isn't surprising, there have been a lot of changes to dungeon generation, and apparently some changes to monster drop probabilities as well.

                    I think a reasonable plan of action is to do the following:

                    1) Finish the set of features to go into 4.2, right now presumably this is dominated by the new classes and spell reworks, but I'm not sure if Nick plans to do a monster rework for 4.2 also. If this is the case, then rebalancing should occur after the monster rework.

                    2) Start a discussion about how to improve randart generation. One of the recent moves was to allow stuff like different numbers of rings/amulets/artifact lights etc. However, this has a few problems, notably that you can get really strong gear for slots that are typically not so strong. I don't understand the randart generation code, and I don't know how to fix it.

                    3) Increase monster density later in the game.

                    4) Reduce vault spawn rate (I believe this has already been done, but it might need to be reduced even further).

                    5) Reduce quality of drops through the ego/artifact promotion rates

                    6) Penalize out of depth items more. Based on some initial stat results, it looks like OoD items can spawn much more commonly now. We should look and adjust that function to make it more of a rare occurrence rather than once every 3-4 levels.

                    7) Consider weakening some standarts

                    My personal preference is to use 3.4 as a point of comparison since that is the last version that we did a dedicated rebalance for. I'd also be ok with taking the lead on 3, 5 and 6. I'm less comfortable with 2 and 7.

                    I do think the key is to get any major feature upgrades for 4.2 up and running before doing the rebalancing. I also think it's ok for 4.1.x to be an easier version of the game, just like 3.1 and 3.2 were super easy. It's the price we pay for new features.

                    Comment

                    • Sideways
                      Knight
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 896

                      #11
                      Part of the problem with randarts is that the correspondence between an artifact's "power" and how strong that artifact actually is isn't very good; so a randart with nominally moderate "power" can actually be silly-powerful, and the game doesn't realize how game-breaking the artifacts it generates are. The main reason Pos-likes have better randart balance is that the item scoring system works better.
                      The Complainer worries about the lack of activity here these days.

                      Comment

                      • Nick
                        Vanilla maintainer
                        • Apr 2007
                        • 9637

                        #12
                        Originally posted by fizzix
                        1) Finish the set of features to go into 4.2, right now presumably this is dominated by the new classes and spell reworks, but I'm not sure if Nick plans to do a monster rework for 4.2 also. If this is the case, then rebalancing should occur after the monster rework.
                        Agreed. I was considering releasing before the monster rework, but I think actually all this stuff needs to be done at once because the bits need balancing against each other.

                        Originally posted by fizzix
                        2) Start a discussion about how to improve randart generation. One of the recent moves was to allow stuff like different numbers of rings/amulets/artifact lights etc. However, this has a few problems, notably that you can get really strong gear for slots that are typically not so strong. I don't understand the randart generation code, and I don't know how to fix it.
                        I suspect (and hope) that it's mainly that I've been too generous with the power distribution that I'm drawing randart powers from; it's possible that Sideways is correct too, and that the power algorithm needs some work. There is also the problem that Estie in particular has brought up about artifacts getting too many little boosts. I think I have a reasonable handle on this.

                        Originally posted by fizzix
                        3) Increase monster density later in the game.
                        Yes; I will keep this in mind when redoing monsters.

                        Originally posted by fizzix
                        4) Reduce vault spawn rate (I believe this has already been done, but it might need to be reduced even further).
                        Maybe done as part of a rethink of vaults/template rooms.

                        Originally posted by fizzix
                        5) Reduce quality of drops through the ego/artifact promotion rates

                        6) Penalize out of depth items more. Based on some initial stat results, it looks like OoD items can spawn much more commonly now. We should look and adjust that function to make it more of a rare occurrence rather than once every 3-4 levels.
                        Seem plausible given the facts.

                        Originally posted by fizzix
                        7) Consider weakening some standarts
                        Some adjustment of artifacts is in order (again, Estie has expressed this well).

                        Originally posted by fizzix
                        My personal preference is to use 3.4 as a point of comparison since that is the last version that we did a dedicated rebalance for. I'd also be ok with taking the lead on 3, 5 and 6. I'm less comfortable with 2 and 7.
                        Convenient, because I have plans already for 2 and 7 (and maybe 4)

                        Originally posted by fizzix
                        I do think the key is to get any major feature upgrades for 4.2 up and running before doing the rebalancing. I also think it's ok for 4.1.x to be an easier version of the game, just like 3.1 and 3.2 were super easy. It's the price we pay for new features.
                        Yes, yes, yes, this is all exactly correct. Thanks, excellent post.
                        One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne
                        In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.

                        Comment

                        • Pete Mack
                          Prophet
                          • Apr 2007
                          • 6883

                          #13
                          Be careful when you squash out of depth objects. The suggestion of an exponential tail is *much* too strict. 1/x (logarithmic) tail is what you want--basically 50 and 100 levels OOD should be roughly as likely, as should 5 and 10 (or 1 and 2.) The way to get that is an O(1/x) probability distribution, and a logarithmic expectation value.

                          For example: if you use base 2, the expected depth for an OOD object is 1+7= 8, with the odds of it being in depth range 51-100 = 1/14.

                          Comment

                          • luneya
                            Swordsman
                            • Aug 2015
                            • 279

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Pete Mack
                            @Grotug--much of the difference in character power is randarts vs standarts. But even with standarts, a 4.1 character would be stronger.
                            Do we have any useful information on the average power of equipment drops in standarts, as regards the comparison of 3.4 vs 4.1 vs feature branch? It seems to me that if there's a balance issue in standarts, we need to get that fixed first, and then worry about how to balance randart generation.

                            Comment

                            • Pete Mack
                              Prophet
                              • Apr 2007
                              • 6883

                              #15
                              Fizzix did an analysis that showed a 17% difference in total artifact count over 100 levels. However, u am not sure which variant has more, and I am not sure about which has more powerful ones in vaults. The ones carried by monsters don't really count unless you are assuming (a) people are clearing levels and (b) monster count per level has been properly adjusted. By and large I only kill about 5% of all generated monsters (looking at Fizzix numbers and monster kill counts in recent games.)

                              To do the analysis properly, you need to analyze ladder posts by variant, and normalized by turn count somehow.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              😀
                              😂
                              🥰
                              😘
                              🤢
                              😎
                              😞
                              😡
                              👍
                              👎