Will Ubuntu repositories get update for Angband?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • strato
    Rookie
    • Apr 2015
    • 11

    Will Ubuntu repositories get update for Angband?

    I enjoy playing Angband on windows, but I use Linux (specifically Xubuntu) a lot as well. The version of Angband available in the Ubuntu Software Center is currently 3.3.2...a bit outdated.

    I know you can get the latest version by compiling the source code, but I'd like to know: will the Angband versions (X11, SDL, GTK) available in Ubuntu Software Center be updated eventually?
  • quarague
    Swordsman
    • Jun 2012
    • 261

    #2
    This is clearly not the way you are supposed to do this, but I resolved this issue by downloading the current windows versions of angband. They run perfectly fine in ubuntu using wine.

    Comment

    • krugar
      Apprentice
      • Sep 2010
      • 76

      #3
      Originally posted by strato
      I know you can get the latest version by compiling the source code, but I'd like to know: will the Angband versions (X11, SDL, GTK) available in Ubuntu Software Center be updated eventually?
      It's up to Ubuntu repository maintainers to decide what and when to update. You won't get a good answer here. Unfortunately, asking them will very likely be also pointless. They are usually deaf to any kind of request. Ubuntu stable repository policies are just plain weird. And not very efective, considering they end up maintaining old and buggy packages, which in fact are often less stable then they claim them to be, due to poor testing on their part.

      Meanwhile, there aren't any PPAs for Angband, either. I could probably start one. But I don't want to, because I just know I will do a bad job at maintaining it.

      So really, for that linux distro, your best bet is to compile it yourself.

      Comment

      • Nick
        Vanilla maintainer
        • Apr 2007
        • 9634

        #4
        Originally posted by krugar
        So really, for that linux distro, your best bet is to compile it yourself.
        Agreed. Just download the source and do the following:
        Code:
        tar xvf angband-4.0.3.tar.gz
        cd angband-4.0.3
        ./autogen.sh
        ./configure
        make
        sudo make install
        To use the SDL port (which I highly recommend) use
        Code:
        ./configure --enable-sdl
        as the configure line - you will have to make sure you have the SDL_ttf and SDL_image library packages installed.
        One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne
        In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.

        Comment

        • strato
          Rookie
          • Apr 2015
          • 11

          #5
          Originally posted by Nick
          Agreed. Just download the source and do the following:
          Code:
          tar xvf angband-4.0.3.tar.gz
          cd angband-4.0.3
          ./autogen.sh
          ./configure
          make
          sudo make install
          To use the SDL port (which I highly recommend) use
          Code:
          ./configure --enable-sdl
          as the configure line - you will have to make sure you have the SDL_ttf and SDL_image library packages installed.

          I know how to compile the source code. Don't get me wrong, it's useful information and I appreciate it, but I taught myself how to a while ago - with some difficulty.
          While I know it probably won't be updated (or if it will be, not very soon), I certainly hope it will be. Linux users trying out Angband might be discouraged to find it so outdated in the Software Center, and less likely to stay interested.

          Originally posted by krugar
          Meanwhile, there aren't any PPAs for Angband, either. I could probably start one. But I don't want to, because I just know I will do a bad job at maintaining it.
          I would personally find a PPA very useful, but it might not be so useful or widely used to justify making one. People who would go through the trouble of using a PPA would probably already know how to compile it anyway.

          Perhaps a simple .deb installer would be a better solution?
          It seems simple enough that I might even try it (not to distribute, just for fun).

          Comment

          Working...
          😀
          😂
          🥰
          😘
          🤢
          😎
          😞
          😡
          👍
          👎