Having just come back to Angband, and downloading the new version for Mac OS X, I decided to try out the tilesets, which I've never used in the past.
I finally settled on the classic tileset. I just went back to the ASCII to try it again.
I think I would prefer the tilesets if there weren't some tiles that are just hard to see and identify. Like it or not, the biggest advantage of classic ASCII, is characters are simple enough to be distinct. However, with Tilesets, the resolution Angband gets played at causes the tiles to just be very small, and often, tiles are hard to see and distinguish.
I guess i'm wondering if this is an issue for others and what others prefer to play.
Do you prefer ASCII or tilesets and why? If Tilesets, which ones do you prefer?
I finally settled on the classic tileset. I just went back to the ASCII to try it again.
I think I would prefer the tilesets if there weren't some tiles that are just hard to see and identify. Like it or not, the biggest advantage of classic ASCII, is characters are simple enough to be distinct. However, with Tilesets, the resolution Angband gets played at causes the tiles to just be very small, and often, tiles are hard to see and distinguish.
I guess i'm wondering if this is an issue for others and what others prefer to play.
Do you prefer ASCII or tilesets and why? If Tilesets, which ones do you prefer?
Comment