Skipping the Start

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mark
    Adept
    • Oct 2007
    • 130

    Skipping the Start

    If a birth option existed that started the game, where you:
    • Spawned you at 500' on an upward staircase
    • Character level 10
    • With a Dagger (+5, +5)
    • a bunch of non-magical armor
    • a couple potions of speed, heroism
    • 5 scrolls of phase door
    • 5 rations of food
    • and 2 scrolls of recall


    Would you use it? Never / Often / Almost Always?
  • Estie
    Veteran
    • Apr 2008
    • 2342

    #2
    Never. The early game is part of every run for me.

    In that list, the big item is the (+5,+5) dagger. Finding such a thing is good reason to stay shallow (as diving results in better enchantments or egos, but on heavy weapons which makes them very undesirable at the start).
    I often have worse on dlvl 30ish.

    Comment

    • mushroom patch
      Swordsman
      • Oct 2014
      • 298

      #3
      Frankly, this is how you should start. angband and other roguelikes would have a lot more players if the opening thirty minutes of play didn't have the peculiar combination of danger and tedium they so consistently manage to create.

      On the other hand, it's not the standard game mode and I'm interested primarily in speed running, so I would never play this way unless it became the standard game mode. Still, I think it's the right idea for a general playing audience.

      Comment

      • fizzix
        Prophet
        • Aug 2009
        • 3025

        #4
        Originally posted by mushroom patch
        Frankly, this is how you should start. angband and other roguelikes would have a lot more players if the opening thirty minutes of play didn't have the peculiar combination of danger and tedium they so consistently manage to create.

        On the other hand, it's not the standard game mode and I'm interested primarily in speed running, so I would never play this way unless it became the standard game mode. Still, I think it's the right idea for a general playing audience.
        Why? If you do this you've just moved the start of game back more. Now it's not 1-5 that is tedious, it's 5-10. So you start at 10, and then 10-15 is tedious and so on. There are some changes to the start that I'd like to see. Mages should have 6 mana, not 2. Priests should have several buff/debuff spells at start (bless, cause fear). SP should regenerate much faster than it currently does. But if you start with a +5, +5 dagger, then everything worse than a +5, +5 dagger is completely useless.

        Comment

        • Nick
          Vanilla maintainer
          • Apr 2007
          • 9629

          #5
          Originally posted by mushroom patch
          Frankly, this is how you should start. angband and other roguelikes would have a lot more players if the opening thirty minutes of play didn't have the peculiar combination of danger and tedium they so consistently manage to create.
          IMHO it's just a short step from this to "Angband would be more popular if it was World of Warcraft", which is true, but kind of misses the point. I think most Angband players play it because of what it is, not what it isn't.
          One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne
          In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.

          Comment

          • Derakon
            Prophet
            • Dec 2009
            • 9022

            #6
            I think the (+5, +5) dagger is ludicrous overkill -- that kind of weapon can carry you to 1500' or more and shouldn't just be handed out at 500'. But I can sympathize with people who want to start the game with a "novice hero" instead of a "rookie". Having more options than just "cast one spell twice", "hit monster with weapon", and "run away" would be nice.

            Ideally each class would have a set of core abilities, at least one of which would be unlocked from the start of the game, but as it stands the only class that's really seriously different at the start from the others is the mage, who cannot afford to melee practically anything.

            Comment

            • mushroom patch
              Swordsman
              • Oct 2014
              • 298

              #7
              Okay, I was not taking the OP as literally as you guys seem to be. Sure, a (+5,+5) dagger is pretty good for that level, probably too good.

              Why? If you do this you've just moved the start of game back more. Now it's not 1-5 that is tedious, it's 5-10. So you start at 10, and then 10-15 is tedious and so on.
              I think that's kind of facile. The first 1-5 levels are exceptionally tedious both by the standards of the game overall and by the standards of games generally, if you don't know what you're doing, which a typical newcomer does not. Of course, maybe 5-10 becomes the new 1-5 in the sense of being the most tedious part of the game, but by some absolute standard, the game becomes less tedious overall and the most tedious part is strictly less tedious than it had been.

              If you play tomenet for a while, you can watch this phenomenon in realtime. Fresh meat arrives, filled with wonder at the possibility of the game. Then they're hit with the grinding reality of not knowing what you're doing in a game where you start out (over and over again) as a guy who dies in fist fights with the town drunks. >95% are gone in a week.

              Now of course, novelty wears off and not everyone's going to stick with anything, regardless. But they don't help themselves out, for example, by requiring level 3 for entry to the main early game dungeon.

              Back to the topic at hand, fifteen minutes of dicking around with molds and kobolds doesn't bother the experienced player. But for beginners, this phase of the game is where a huge part of the game is spent. It's too much. Not only does it take a lot of time when you don't know what you're doing, it doesn't even teach you useful lessons about higher level play. You know why people go nuts when they get killed by a drolem? Because it takes them tens of hours of play to get in the position to get killed by a drolem. Then they're back to groping around, trying to figure out how to get past level 15.

              On the margin, starting at level 5 (or the equivalent) makes this dynamic slightly less demoralizing to the beginner. A slight difference can be really big in terms of its effect on retention, though.

              Comment

              • bio_hazard
                Knight
                • Dec 2008
                • 649

                #8
                This is where a game server could really help. Mine the ladder for some range of stats and equipment at a certain more advanced level, and generate a character randomly from somewhere in that distribution. Or treat it like a hot-seat game, where you'd actually take over an old character at some progression point.

                Comment

                • fizzix
                  Prophet
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 3025

                  #9
                  Originally posted by mushroom patch
                  Back to the topic at hand, fifteen minutes of dicking around with molds and kobolds doesn't bother the experienced player. But for beginners, this phase of the game is where a huge part of the game is spent. It's too much. Not only does it take a lot of time when you don't know what you're doing, it doesn't even teach you useful lessons about higher level play. You know why people go nuts when they get killed by a drolem? Because it takes them tens of hours of play to get in the position to get killed by a drolem. Then they're back to groping around, trying to figure out how to get past level 15.
                  Would you be satisfied with Derakon's suggestion about giving more options to a beginning character? A starting mage or priest only has one spell, we could give them two, along with 6 SP. We could allow you to choose additional starting gear choices which might look something like:

                  Hunter gear: A sling, 10 (good) pebbles, 5 (excellent) pebbles
                  Alchemist gear: 5 CLW potions, 1 potion of healing (id'd) 1 potion of restore mana (id'd) one random unid'd positive potion (cannot be exp, can be stat swap)
                  Wizard gear: Wand of magic missile, Wand of stinking cloud, 1 random unid'd wand
                  Soldier gear: Starting melee weapon is good (starting bow for rangers)
                  Noble gear: good leather armor, good leather cap
                  Adventurer gear: Staff of detect evil (id'd), Staff of detect invisible (id'd), 10 scrolls of treasure detection, 10 scrolls of magic mapping

                  Good items are calculated at depth 0, so they'd be equivalent to Maggot drops. This works better for no-selling, by the way. Otherwise, it makes sense just to grab the most expensive option.

                  Comment

                  • quarague
                    Swordsman
                    • Jun 2012
                    • 261

                    #10
                    I like fizzix idea. If this is the standard start, it makes the early game more distinct depending on which option you choose. And of course you can also add in hard versions with less and only normal instead of good gear and the ultra version of starting out naked and broke.

                    Comment

                    • Derakon
                      Prophet
                      • Dec 2009
                      • 9022

                      #11
                      Originally posted by fizzix
                      Hunter gear: A sling, 10 (good) pebbles, 5 (excellent) pebbles
                      Alchemist gear: 5 CLW potions, 1 potion of healing (id'd) 1 potion of restore mana (id'd) one random unid'd positive potion (cannot be exp, can be stat swap)
                      Wizard gear: Wand of magic missile, Wand of stinking cloud, 1 random unid'd wand
                      Soldier gear: Starting melee weapon is good (starting bow for rangers)
                      Noble gear: good leather armor, good leather cap
                      Adventurer gear: Staff of detect evil (id'd), Staff of detect invisible (id'd), 10 scrolls of treasure detection, 10 scrolls of magic mapping
                      This is a good idea. Nice thinking!

                      Comment

                      • Estie
                        Veteran
                        • Apr 2008
                        • 2342

                        #12
                        I dont agree. Why give players gear options, but (want to) prevent them from "just" selling their gear ? Looks to me like you are trying to play the game for them or at least railroad them into arbitrary pathes.

                        Simply add a birth option: Easy start, add 1000 $ and 2 deep descent scrolls to the normal equipment and let them decide for themselves whether they want to buy armor or wands or whatnot.

                        Comment

                        • Derakon
                          Prophet
                          • Dec 2009
                          • 9022

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Estie
                          I dont agree. Why give players gear options, but (want to) prevent them from "just" selling their gear ? Looks to me like you are trying to play the game for them or at least railroad them into arbitrary pathes.
                          Fizzix didn't say anything about preventing people from selling stuff, just that the concept makes a bit more sense in a no-selling game.

                          And given that the goal here is to provide the player with more options at the start of the game (and presumably, concurrently also make the start of the game slightly more challenging so there's a reason to use those options), it makes sense that each of those gear packs would be geared towards a certain playstyle. By all means, suggest alternatives if you think there's a niche that isn't represented here. A pack that included some Deep Descent scrolls wouldn't be entirely unreasonable.

                          Comment

                          • Estie
                            Veteran
                            • Apr 2008
                            • 2342

                            #14
                            My point is that its none of the games business to gear for anyones playstyle; people are capable of choosing it without being directed. Most of the items suggested by Fizzix are readily available in basic shops and having money gives more options than gear bundles, not less.

                            I threw in the deep descent scrolls because the op was about skipping the small kobold phase and these scrolls would do the job, but they arent sold in basic shops.

                            Quote Fizzix:

                            "This works better for no-selling, by the way. Otherwise, it makes sense just to grab the most expensive option."

                            This sounds to me like he doesnt want players to sell their stuff.

                            Comment

                            • bio_hazard
                              Knight
                              • Dec 2008
                              • 649

                              #15
                              There's no reason that you couldn't also have a gold-only option.

                              There are a couple of advantages to the kits as I see it. First, it is serving suggestions if you don't want to have to think about it. Also, if the point is to speed up the early game, then taking a wad of money and running around to shops to see if they have these items is not going to be quite as nice a solution if it's possible to hit one key and get everything in inventory.

                              One thing that might be interesting to think about would be a minor !exp that's ~100xp.

                              If you wanted a diver's kit- one of those potions and 2 ?Deep Decent, 1 !CCW 2 ?PhaseDoor.

                              But how much of this is going to be moot if the number of levels gets reduced in future releases?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              😀
                              😂
                              🥰
                              😘
                              🤢
                              😎
                              😞
                              😡
                              👍
                              👎