I know this has been discussed before, with the conclusion that the location of reading ?Acquirement did not matter. However, I am convinced that it does, although I haven't parsed through the code. In the code for the ?Acquirement, is it checking the dl @ is actually on, or is it checking the dl of the particular location?
My understanding is that certain locations in vaults are identified with an "8", "9", or ",", signifying treasure 20, 7, or 7 levels out of depth, respectively. When the ?Acquirement is read at an "8" location, it seems to consistently deliver better results than when read elsewhere.
My understanding is that certain locations in vaults are identified with an "8", "9", or ",", signifying treasure 20, 7, or 7 levels out of depth, respectively. When the ?Acquirement is read at an "8" location, it seems to consistently deliver better results than when read elsewhere.
Comment