Stealth vs Aggravation

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Tibarius
    Swordsman
    • Jun 2011
    • 429

    Stealth vs Aggravation

    If you are very stealthy and at the same time have gear that aggravates, how is that handled?

    Cheers,
    Tibarius
    Blondes are more fun!
  • Max Stats
    Swordsman
    • Jun 2010
    • 324

    #2
    Originally posted by Tibarius
    If you are very stealthy and at the same time have gear that aggravates, how is that handled?

    Cheers,
    Tibarius
    Currently aggravation negates stealth, no matter how high stealth is. There has been talk to make aggravation be a penalty to stealth, rather than an "on-or-off" auto-disturb. This would mean there would still be a meaningful choice of whether to wear another aggravating item if you already have one equipped.
    If beauty is in the eye of the beholder, then why are beholders so freaking ugly?

    Comment

    • dos350
      Knight
      • Sep 2010
      • 546

      #3
      i think leave it as it is, otherwise aggrevate would become not mattering even earlier and all those crazy aggrevate items would become 2g, please , no rage~
      ~eek

      Reality hits you -more-

      S+++++++++++++++++++

      Comment

      • fizzix
        Prophet
        • Aug 2009
        • 3025

        #4
        Originally posted by Max Stats
        Currently aggravation negates stealth, no matter how high stealth is. There has been talk to make aggravation be a penalty to stealth, rather than an "on-or-off" auto-disturb. This would mean there would still be a meaningful choice of whether to wear another aggravating item if you already have one equipped.
        dos's objections aside. Multiple pvals allow for this, and it should be implemented for 3.4 Aggravate can be removed the ch screen, and large stealth penalties can be added. Something like.

        -20 = the one ring, morgoth's crown, grond
        -15 = Palantir, Doomcaller, Deathwreaker, Gothmog, Haradrim,
        -10 = Eol, Calris, Zarcuthra, Anguirel, Umbar
        -5 = Razorback, Hammerhand, Gorlim, Camlost, Mormegil, Melkor, gloves of combat (3-6 or something)

        Comment

        • jens
          Swordsman
          • Apr 2011
          • 348

          #5
          Large stealth malus is not the same as aggravate, since stealth cannot get negative

          Comment

          • Derakon
            Prophet
            • Dec 2009
            • 9022

            #6
            Stealth of 0 should be equivalent to aggravation, though, or at least almost identical -- IIRC the best you can hope for is that a monster stays asleep for one turn before waking up.

            Comment

            • fizzix
              Prophet
              • Aug 2009
              • 3025

              #7
              Originally posted by Derakon
              Stealth of 0 should be equivalent to aggravation, though, or at least almost identical -- IIRC the best you can hope for is that a monster stays asleep for one turn before waking up.
              agreed. This is where I think we should go with this.

              Comment

              • jens
                Swordsman
                • Apr 2011
                • 348

                #8
                Originally posted by Derakon
                Stealth of 0 should be equivalent to aggravation, though, or at least almost identical -- IIRC the best you can hope for is that a monster stays asleep for one turn before waking up.
                Well, you disturb all monsters every turn, but only by 100/distance. So you will wake up monsters you walk up to, but you can walk by heavy sleepers in the same room.

                Comment

                Working...
                😀
                😂
                🥰
                😘
                🤢
                😎
                😞
                😡
                👍
                👎