OOD objects too common?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Philip
    Knight
    • Jul 2009
    • 909

    OOD objects too common?

    It seems I am finding OOD objects too often. Is it a consequence of the attack on junk or is the chance of OOD the same. My character found a pot of EXP on 16 after finding an executioners sword on dlevel 7. He's dead, a mage. I hate confusion attacks every turn until my potions run out and I die. Not an umber hulk surprisingly, but a jelly pit i phased into. I'd like some feedback on what you think.
  • Timo Pietilä
    Prophet
    • Apr 2007
    • 4096

    #2
    Originally posted by Philip
    I hate confusion attacks every turn until my potions run out and I die. Not an umber hulk surprisingly, but a jelly pit i phased into. I'd like some feedback on what you think.
    You can fight while confused. You just not necessarily move at the intended direction. You should have fought until you step into grid which does not have confuser.

    Comment

    • Philip
      Knight
      • Jul 2009
      • 909

      #3
      I was surrounded, I hadn't actually cleared the pit much and was fleeing and had to phase, and got surrounded. Fighting does not work well when offensive capabilities are mage level 28 melee with one blow at 4d3 (+8,+8). Also, molds and jelly's have lot's of hitpoints.

      Comment

      • Derakon
        Prophet
        • Dec 2009
        • 9022

        #4
        This is what staves of teleportation are for. That and not casting Phase Door when you're in danger of being sent into a pit.

        As for OoD objects, I can't say that my observations match yours, but that doesn't mean they're invalid. *shrug*

        Comment

        • PowerDiver
          Prophet
          • Mar 2008
          • 2820

          #5
          Originally posted by Derakon
          As for OoD objects, I can't say that my observations match yours, but that doesn't mean they're invalid. *shrug*
          I don't know about OoD objects, but OoD monsters are insane. I detected a great wyrm of balance in a vault in the 30's, maybe DL36. When the anti-strategy people implement "all D's detect alike" that will be a source of unavoidable instakill.

          Comment

          • d_m
            Angband Devteam member
            • Aug 2008
            • 1517

            #6
            Originally posted by PowerDiver
            I don't know about OoD objects, but OoD monsters are insane. I detected a great wyrm of balance in a vault in the 30's, maybe DL36. When the anti-strategy people implement "all D's detect alike" that will be a source of unavoidable instakill.
            What kind of vault? If you were on dungeon level 39 and hit a vault that had an "8" square then a level 79 monster wouldn't be unreasonable.

            EDIT: Also, I don't think it's a foregone conclusion that all (or any) detection will be changed to the "generic D" plan... although I know that some people do want to try it out.
            linux->xterm->screen->pmacs

            Comment

            • Derakon
              Prophet
              • Dec 2009
              • 9022

              #7
              Vault monsters can be generated up to 40 dlvls OOD. So of course you can just avoid the vault, or you can take your chances, knowing that that D could be something very nasty indeed. This is just another iteration of the calculated risk-taking that you yourself originally advocated in the form of powerdiving.

              Though as far as weakening detection is concerned, the most I would believe someone has planned is to revert to the frog-knows style where you can see the letter, position, and color, but can't 'l'ook at the monster. Thus you should be able to guess based on the color of the monster (and any relevant flickering) what type it is.

              I guess that just gives more strength to players who have memorized monster.txt though.

              Comment

              • PowerDiver
                Prophet
                • Mar 2008
                • 2820

                #8
                Originally posted by Derakon
                Vault monsters can be generated up to 40 dlvls OOD. So of course you can just avoid the vault, or you can take your chances, knowing that that D could be something very nasty indeed.
                There's no point putting that kind of vault down if 95% of the time the right action is not to enter it because you don't know whether you will be risking instakill. If you provide enough info via detection to figure out what it the D is [color, danger warning, whatever] you might as well leave things as they are.

                Comment

                • d_m
                  Angband Devteam member
                  • Aug 2008
                  • 1517

                  #9
                  Originally posted by PowerDiver
                  There's no point putting that kind of vault down if 95% of the time the right action is not to enter it because you don't know whether you will be risking instakill. If you provide enough info via detection to figure out what it the D is [color, danger warning, whatever] you might as well leave things as they are.
                  To be clear: I don't think there is a concrete plan to replace *all* detection with frog-knows detection, or something else.

                  I've heard of ideas to have various kinds of limited ESP (e.g. pval-radius, ESP for orcs only, or ESP for presence only, or kind only, etc) as well as a pseudo-ESP for monster presence (listening or something like that). I know that Timo really wanted detection reverted to frog-knows, and I think Magnate was interested in trying it out, but I don't think there's a plan to definitely do it.

                  If you want a list of ideas devs have for 3.3 difficulty stuff you can check out: http://trac.rephial.org/wiki/DifficultGame

                  To be clear, nothing is really set in stone--those are ideas that devs are *generally* in agreement about, I think.
                  linux->xterm->screen->pmacs

                  Comment

                  • Magnate
                    Angband Devteam member
                    • May 2007
                    • 5110

                    #10
                    Originally posted by d_m
                    To be clear: I don't think there is a concrete plan to replace *all* detection with frog-knows detection, or something else.

                    I've heard of ideas to have various kinds of limited ESP (e.g. pval-radius, ESP for orcs only, or ESP for presence only, or kind only, etc) as well as a pseudo-ESP for monster presence (listening or something like that). I know that Timo really wanted detection reverted to frog-knows, and I think Magnate was interested in trying it out, but I don't think there's a plan to definitely do it.
                    To be clear, we are really only talking about ESP, aren't we?

                    - nobody is proposing to nerf the automatic recognition of any visible monster in LOS

                    - nobody is proposing to nerf the Detect or Reveal Monsters spells, or their derivatives (Detect Evil etc.), as these take a whole turn.

                    So that brings us back to ESP, which is simply way too powerful as currently implemented. So yes, I do think that some sort of nerf is in order. I like Sangband's racial ESP (it has separate ESP for undead, animals and demons, governed by realm skill), but I also like Timo's idea of reverting to f-k for monsters not in LOS. I also like the idea of making ESP pval-dependent, so you'd have a radius of 2 squares per point, meaning you'd want to collect two or three items to reach the max radius of 20. Or the pval could govern frequency rather than radius (this is how Sang works - the creatures appear infrequently at low skill, as if they have WEIRD_MIND, and are white asterisks, and then they appear more consistently as their proper letter and colour as skill increases). Or both.

                    These could be combined - we could have separate types of ESP, each with different radii and/or frequency. Thoughts welcome.
                    "Been away so long I hardly knew the place, gee it's good to be back home" - The Beatles

                    Comment

                    • Derakon
                      Prophet
                      • Dec 2009
                      • 9022

                      #11
                      Originally posted by PowerDiver
                      There's no point putting that kind of vault down if 95% of the time the right action is not to enter it because you don't know whether you will be risking instakill.
                      Everything you do in the game is risking instakill. There's always the possibility, however slim, that you've screwed something up or forgotten to take something into account or just plain been screwed over by the RNG.

                      For you, you won't want to risk those vaults because the monster in one might be more dangerous than you're willing to tackle (this is the "risk of a risk of an instadeath"); others might be willing to take that risk, knowing that they could be facing an "It breathes, you die" death. You apparently hate taking risks that are due to lack of knowledge, but that doesn't mean that those risks are bad, or that having them reduces fun for all or even most players.

                      Comment

                      • Timo Pietilä
                        Prophet
                        • Apr 2007
                        • 4096

                        #12
                        Originally posted by PowerDiver
                        There's no point putting that kind of vault down if 95% of the time the right action is not to enter it because you don't know whether you will be risking instakill.
                        That would be more like 0% chance of being insta-killed if you play it right. You could clear vaults without insta-kill risk in frog-knows, so your argument doesn't hold water.

                        If it is 95% instakill for your playstyle, then don't go there.

                        Originally posted by PowerDiver
                        If you provide enough info via detection to figure out what it the D is [color, danger warning, whatever] you might as well leave things as they are.
                        Plain color tells you general type of the monster, not exact type, which is enough. Balance dragons are violet, so they are easy to recognize. More difficult cases are impact/earth hounds, gravity/inertia hounds and stuff like that. Now that we have more colors used distinguishing monsters from each others is rather easy.

                        Comment

                        • Zyphyr
                          Adept
                          • Jan 2008
                          • 135

                          #13
                          Originally posted by PowerDiver
                          I don't know about OoD objects, but OoD monsters are insane. I detected a great wyrm of balance in a vault in the 30's, maybe DL36. When the anti-strategy people implement "all D's detect alike" that will be a source of unavoidable instakill.
                          Last night, CL 5 mage on DL 8. Cast Detect Monster, and what do I see down in the corner? Smaug (native to DL48). The monster description promised me some absurdly high amount of XP for killing him.

                          Comment

                          • Derakon
                            Prophet
                            • Dec 2009
                            • 9022

                            #14
                            Ahh, a sling, some iron shots, and Phase Door's all you need for that fight. Right?

                            What kind of odds would a clvl 5 mage have to even hit Smaug?

                            Comment

                            • d_m
                              Angband Devteam member
                              • Aug 2008
                              • 1517

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Zyphyr
                              Last night, CL 5 mage on DL 8. Cast Detect Monster, and what do I see down in the corner? Smaug (native to DL48). The monster description promised me some absurdly high amount of XP for killing him.
                              Was that in a vault also? I guess you wouldn't be sure at character level 5...
                              linux->xterm->screen->pmacs

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              😀
                              😂
                              🥰
                              😘
                              🤢
                              😎
                              😞
                              😡
                              👍
                              👎