Dungeon size: small

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Magnate
    Angband Devteam member
    • May 2007
    • 5110

    #31
    Originally posted by fph
    OTOH, unless I am overlooking something, a couple of destructions in the wrong place can get an ironman character stuck forever in a level. I would think twice before starting an ironman character in the new versions.

    If we do want to keep this destruction-removes-stairs patch, another possible solution is allowing tunnelling through the floor to leave the level, like in Nethack.
    OTOH, this leads to other potentially unbalanced side-effects: for instance, divers would no longer need to wander around a level to find a staircase down.
    This is why the destruction-creates-trapdoor-if-it-removes-stairs-down is such a neat solution - it solves the ironman problem without that side effect on diving. Ironmen would need to be careful to avoid disarming the trapdoor though ('W' in standard keyset to walk into it).
    "Been away so long I hardly knew the place, gee it's good to be back home" - The Beatles

    Comment

    • Max Stats
      Swordsman
      • Jun 2010
      • 324

      #32
      Originally posted by fph
      OTOH, unless I am overlooking something, a couple of destructions in the wrong place can get an ironman character stuck forever in a level. I would think twice before starting an ironman character in the new versions.

      If we do want to keep this destruction-removes-stairs patch, another possible solution is allowing tunnelling through the floor to leave the level, like in Nethack.
      OTOH, this leads to other potentially unbalanced side-effects: for instance, divers would no longer need to wander around a level to find a staircase down.
      What if this were only possible in an area that had been destructed? That would mean that the floor has been weakened to the point that it is possible to dig through. Saves you the trouble of creating a trapdoor, which seems a bit of a hack.

      Oooh, carrying this a bit further, how about after a few destructions in the same spot, there is a chance that the dungeon caves in under you and drops you to the next level? Barring, of course, the un-killed quest monster on the current level.
      If beauty is in the eye of the beholder, then why are beholders so freaking ugly?

      Comment

      • Derakon
        Prophet
        • Dec 2009
        • 9022

        #33
        This reminds me: I can't remember the last time I entered a level and discovered it had been destructed already. I always liked that bit of flavor. Anyone know why it was removed?

        As for the "don't let destruction trap you" issue, I'd suggest simply having a new dungeon feature, "gaping hole", that acts like a trapdoor when walked on, but is always visible and can't be disarmed, unlike traps. Then just generate one or two of those whenever Destruction is used, modulo the usual "can't skip quest monsters" stuff.

        Comment

        • Netbrian
          Adept
          • Jun 2009
          • 141

          #34
          Originally posted by Magnate
          This is why the destruction-creates-trapdoor-if-it-removes-stairs-down is such a neat solution - it solves the ironman problem without that side effect on diving. Ironmen would need to be careful to avoid disarming the trapdoor though ('W' in standard keyset to walk into it).
          I think that this is still more trouble than having destruction destroy stairs is worth, due to the fact the trapdoor can be disarmed. I'd as soon leave out the mechanic altogether.

          Comment

          • Magnate
            Angband Devteam member
            • May 2007
            • 5110

            #35
            Originally posted by Derakon
            This reminds me: I can't remember the last time I entered a level and discovered it had been destructed already. I always liked that bit of flavor. Anyone know why it was removed?
            Everyone else hated them. Honest.
            "Been away so long I hardly knew the place, gee it's good to be back home" - The Beatles

            Comment

            • Max Stats
              Swordsman
              • Jun 2010
              • 324

              #36
              Originally posted by Derakon
              This reminds me: I can't remember the last time I entered a level and discovered it had been destructed already. I always liked that bit of flavor. Anyone know why it was removed?

              As for the "don't let destruction trap you" issue, I'd suggest simply having a new dungeon feature, "gaping hole", that acts like a trapdoor when walked on, but is always visible and can't be disarmed, unlike traps. Then just generate one or two of those whenever Destruction is used, modulo the usual "can't skip quest monsters" stuff.
              If we want to be a bit silly, the holes could still be created on quest levels, but if you try to jump into one, a magical trampoline could bounce you back up to the current level, with a slight chance of minor damage from hitting your head on the ceiling.

              I like the idea; I think a nice touch would be to confirm that you actually want to jump into the hole.
              If beauty is in the eye of the beholder, then why are beholders so freaking ugly?

              Comment

              • Derakon
                Prophet
                • Dec 2009
                • 9022

                #37
                Originally posted by Magnate
                Everyone else hated them. Honest.
                Well that just confirms my long-held suspicion that I'm the only person with any taste around here.

                Comment

                • Timo Pietilä
                  Prophet
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 4096

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Derakon
                  Well that just confirms my long-held suspicion that I'm the only person with any taste around here.
                  Not the only one, I did find them refreshing. They certainly were more interesting than maze-levels in current dev-version.

                  Comment

                  • Timo Pietilä
                    Prophet
                    • Apr 2007
                    • 4096

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Timo Pietilä
                    I agree that more different types of dungeons is a good thing, but the old style dungeon should be the main one. It was not broken, so there is no reason to fix it.

                    Old style maybe 60% of time, rest of the types 40% of the time would be good I think.
                    For the rest, could you do something for the initial position of the player? I have found myself now in several cases completely surrounded in melee-distance by several groups of monsters upon arriving to the level. That's really dangerous deeper in dungeon, especially with this small dungeons. There were no space to even use the old "create doors" tactic.

                    I think current level generation guarantees that I get the first move (including melee, unlike in old versions), but if those groups were something like gravity hounds and time hounds only solution would be to immediately bail out (*destruction* or mass banish if available). Teleporting deep in dungeon can be death sentence, and I would like to avoid that if I can.

                    Comment

                    • Derakon
                      Prophet
                      • Dec 2009
                      • 9022

                      #40
                      I have had a couple of situations now where a fight's gone bad, so I've teleported level, and then had to teleport level again on my next one or two turns because I entered the new level in a bad position.

                      NPP apparently goes out of its way to bring the player in in a secluded area with no monsters around (generally around a corner in a corridor). Might be worth borrowing that.

                      Comment

                      • s0be
                        Apprentice
                        • Jan 2008
                        • 96

                        #41
                        Originally posted by Max Stats
                        If we want to be a bit silly, the holes could still be created on quest levels, but if you try to jump into one, a magical trampoline could bounce you back up to the current level, with a slight chance of minor damage from hitting your head on the ceiling.

                        I like the idea; I think a nice touch would be to confirm that you actually want to jump into the hole.
                        "You jump into the hole down" ... "you miss"

                        Comment

                        • buzzkill
                          Prophet
                          • May 2008
                          • 2939

                          #42
                          Originally posted by s0be
                          "You jump into the hole down" ... "you miss"
                          "You jump into the hole down"... "you are stuck."
                          www.mediafire.com/buzzkill - Get your 32x32 tiles here. UT32 now compatible Ironband and Quickband 9/6/2012.
                          My banding life on Buzzkill's ladder.

                          Comment

                          • Timo Pietilä
                            Prophet
                            • Apr 2007
                            • 4096

                            #43
                            Originally posted by buzzkill
                            "You jump into the hole down"... "you are stuck."
                            "You jump into the hole down" ... "your big fat ass doesn't fit thru" ... "you hear something below you laughing itself to death" [Gain some XP]

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            😀
                            😂
                            🥰
                            😘
                            🤢
                            😎
                            😞
                            😡
                            👍
                            👎