There's really nothing that Git offers that I could consider essential to the point of suggesting changing the revision control system already in place for an existing project. Under most situations (although I could accept some extraordinary ones as not applying) all this is essentially about advantages of one system over another being wrongly dubbed essential, and a lack of actual analysis of the disadvantages; i.e. everything is marvelous, except for the things that will soon show up as not being so good and that no one thought about before.
In the end you replace one set of problems for another different set of problems.
But this is really way off-topic here (and useless since the decision was already made). I'm willing to discuss it on another place if you so wish.
In the end you replace one set of problems for another different set of problems.
But this is really way off-topic here (and useless since the decision was already made). I'm willing to discuss it on another place if you so wish.
Comment