[YACD] [V3.1.1] HE Ranger: What to carry?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pete Mack
    Prophet
    • Apr 2007
    • 6883

    [YACD] [V3.1.1] HE Ranger: What to carry?

    I'm trying for 500K turn win.
    I've got a big stack of useful staves & swaps, so my inventory is completely full of stuff I want to carry.

    Any suggestions on what to drop?


    * Staff of Dispel Evil, but it really cuts turncount on troll pits.
    * Azhagal swap for IM_Fire is another possibility.
    * MB3, and do without Sat. Hunger, Detect Invis and STM. (ID spell is worthless, and I have ESP as primary swap.)
    * !Heroism (Saving throw is 83%, pretty good, but I'm still only Heroic in melee (where I do a lot of damage--archery is very weak.)
  • Magnate
    Angband Devteam member
    • May 2007
    • 5110

    #2
    Originally posted by Pete Mack
    I'm trying for 500K turn win.
    I've got a big stack of useful staves & swaps, so my inventory is completely full of stuff I want to carry.

    Any suggestions on what to drop?


    * Staff of Dispel Evil, but it really cuts turncount on troll pits.
    * Azhagal swap for IM_Fire is another possibility.
    * MB3, and do without Sat. Hunger, Detect Invis and STM. (ID spell is worthless, and I have ESP as primary swap.)
    * !Heroism (Saving throw is 83%, pretty good, but I'm still only Heroic in melee (where I do a lot of damage--archery is very weak.)
    I would drop MB3 and the staff, and keep Azaghal and !hero.

    Also, what do you use MB2 for? My rangers don't carry it, IIRC.
    "Been away so long I hardly knew the place, gee it's good to be back home" - The Beatles

    Comment

    • Pete Mack
      Prophet
      • Apr 2007
      • 6883

      #3
      I commute by teleportation, rather a lot. (It's the only spell I use in MB2.)

      Detect objects [nothing]
      Teleport Self
      Detect objects [something good]
      Detect doors, monsters, Magic Map
      go pick it up, and fight any useful targets.
      NOTE: not recommended with bad stealth or aggravation, or when lots of dangerous monsters are already awake.

      I don't think it's possible to win in <500K turns without this trick.

      PS: I surely wouldn't mind if an alternate spell were added to Mordy's. That would really help a lot.

      Comment

      • fizzix
        Prophet
        • Aug 2009
        • 3025

        #4
        What are you carrying Raal's for? Do you ever use it?

        If you're going for turncount be a bit wary about chucking MB3. Having to recall because of food can be annoying. Even if you bring a scroll or two of satisfy hunger down, it'll be the first thing you chuck when inventory fills up. I'd keep MB3 and ditch the scrolls of recharging. Use one on your empty staff first. How often are you recharging stuff in the dungeon?

        I'd drop the rods of TO at home. If you manage to get 4 or 5 then chuck the wands and use the rods instead. Don't waste an inventory slot carrying both around.

        I think you're going to need at least a swap for Regen.

        Comment

        • Remuz
          Apprentice
          • Apr 2007
          • 77

          #5
          Please allow one newbish question.

          What motivated your choice of high-elf? Sure, there are great advantages to that class, but wouldn't the XP penalty complicate your objective of winning under 500k turns?

          Comment

          • Magnate
            Angband Devteam member
            • May 2007
            • 5110

            #6
            Originally posted by Remuz
            Please allow one newbish question.

            What motivated your choice of high-elf? Sure, there are great advantages to that class, but wouldn't the XP penalty complicate your objective of winning under 500k turns?
            Generally not. The XP penalty simply means you're approx 2 experience levels behind where a human would be (and only one behind another fairly high xp class, like a hobbit). Later in the game it's all about stats, and the difference between something like 37 and 39 is pretty trivial - not enough hp, sp or failure to matter.
            "Been away so long I hardly knew the place, gee it's good to be back home" - The Beatles

            Comment

            • fizzix
              Prophet
              • Aug 2009
              • 3025

              #7
              Originally posted by Magnate
              Generally not. The XP penalty simply means you're approx 2 experience levels behind where a human would be (and only one behind another fairly high xp class, like a hobbit). Later in the game it's all about stats, and the difference between something like 37 and 39 is pretty trivial - not enough hp, sp or failure to matter.
              This is very true (and IMO a bad thing).

              Comment

              • Magnate
                Angband Devteam member
                • May 2007
                • 5110

                #8
                Originally posted by fizzix
                This is very true (and IMO a bad thing).
                Bad how? You mean that the XP penalty is not enough of a true penalty? But those high-xp classes are intended to be "easier", so gimping them in some real way would defeat the point of them. Or you mean that the difference is no negligible at high levels? That's a much bigger deal (at least for me), but has much more complex solutions: making a lot more things depend on clev is moving a long way down the spectrum from V to O. Clev has never been a big deal in V, it's mainly just a few hp and a small reduction in failure rates. Even those are mainly dealt with by CON and spell stat.
                "Been away so long I hardly knew the place, gee it's good to be back home" - The Beatles

                Comment

                • Nick
                  Vanilla maintainer
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 9647

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Pete Mack
                  I commute by teleportation, rather a lot.
                  So that's telecommuting, right?
                  One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne
                  In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.

                  Comment

                  • fizzix
                    Prophet
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 3025

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Magnate
                    Or you mean that the difference is no negligible at high levels? That's a much bigger deal (at least for me), but has much more complex solutions: making a lot more things depend on clev is moving a long way down the spectrum from V to O. Clev has never been a big deal in V, it's mainly just a few hp and a small reduction in failure rates. Even those are mainly dealt with by CON and spell stat.
                    This one. Maybe I'd prefer the way that O does it. Even if the HP bonus was a more linear function of CON it'd be better. Changing Con from 15-16 doesn't seem to matter at all, but changing it from 18/170-18/180 can give you 50 or so HP. Same with SP and INT/WIS

                    With HP it *sometimes* leads to interesting situations. But with SP I think it really reduces gameplay in that there's always some point where suddenly you can cast a bunch of spells, whereas before only a couple were reasonable. Even with HP there's often a breakpoint from 'almost everything can kill me with one breath' to 'nothing can kill me with one breath'

                    Comment

                    • Pete Mack
                      Prophet
                      • Apr 2007
                      • 6883

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Nick
                      So that's telecommuting, right?
                      Right. And it doesn't work very well when your character is a high level executive.

                      The teleportation algorithm needs to be fixed, so you don't just bounce back and forth between two or three (dangerous) rooms at either end of the map.

                      Comment

                      • fizzix
                        Prophet
                        • Aug 2009
                        • 3025

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Pete Mack
                        Right. And it doesn't work very well when your character is a high level executive.

                        The teleportation algorithm needs to be fixed, so you don't just bounce back and forth between two or three (dangerous) rooms at either end of the map.
                        The problem is that the distance value for SPELL_TELEPORT_SELF is plevel*5 for and plevel*8 for PRAYER_TELEPORT_SELF. The minimum distance for teleport_player is plevel *[5,8]/2

                        Just change the minimum range cutoff. Instead of using dis/2 use minimum of dis/2 and N (50 or 75 seems reasonable) Especially for priests using teleport self, with a minimum distance of 200 at plevel 50 you are almost bound to go as far away from your current location as possible.

                        Comment

                        • Pete Mack
                          Prophet
                          • Apr 2007
                          • 6883

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Remuz
                          Please allow one newbish question.

                          What motivated your choice of high-elf? Sure, there are great advantages to that class, but wouldn't the XP penalty complicate your objective of winning under 500k turns?

                          Just for the record--you really don't need to be cl 50 to win, especially with an Uber-powerful character like High-elf Ranger. It's much more important to start out strong, because all characters with +CON race bonus are adequately strong at the end.

                          Here's the corresponding winning post:



                          I used Crown of Might & Amulet of ESP for sustains in the final battle, allowing me to swap in RoDamage as well. Ran out of arrows at 2 stars. (Didn't bother to pick them up, since 114 dam/turn is more than enough to take M in melee.) Prior to that, used Thranduil for +INT, for spell failure rates.

                          Comment

                          • Remuz
                            Apprentice
                            • Apr 2007
                            • 77

                            #14
                            Well, what can I say... congratulations!

                            Comment

                            • Pete Mack
                              Prophet
                              • Apr 2007
                              • 6883

                              #15
                              @Remuz -
                              thanks!

                              Really, that win was pretty easy. (2 !Heal and 2 !CCW, along with several escapes when M summoned uniques, as most of them were still alive)

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              😀
                              😂
                              🥰
                              😘
                              🤢
                              😎
                              😞
                              😡
                              👍
                              👎