When excellent is better than splendid?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • brbrbr
    Adept
    • Sep 2015
    • 110

    When excellent is better than splendid?

    Guys, I usually auto-squelch(ignore) non-artifact items once I have artifact equipped.
    Do I miss something?
    Are there excellent items which are better than splendid?

    Potential candidates:
    - Mace of Disruption
    - Scythe of Slicing
    - Ring of Damage instead of Ring of Slaying
    - Boots of Speed vs any other artifacts boots
    - Sling of Buckhand
  • fph
    Veteran
    • Apr 2009
    • 1030

    #2
    MoDs and SoSs get their own special squelching category ("great weapons"), although this may not not evident at first. So you can typically squelch the other weapon categories safely.

    Boots of speed and slings of Buckland are splendid, if I am not missing anything.
    --
    Dive fast, die young, leave a high-CHA corpse.

    Comment

    • Derakon
      Prophet
      • Dec 2009
      • 9022

      #3
      All that "splendid" means is that it has an effect that's immediately noticeable when you equip it. A Robe of Permanence is excellent; Dwarven Scale Mail is splendid (because of the stat bonus).

      Comment

      • Ingwe Ingweron
        Veteran
        • Jan 2009
        • 2129

        #4
        I am cautious about ignoring "Excellent but not Splendid" shields, helms, robes and cloaks. (Don't want to miss out on Shields of Preservation, Helms of Regeneration, Robes of Permanence, etc.)

        The new Ego ignore has helped out a lot. You can ignore specific item types while leaving the quality settings alone in cases where you are interested in an item without an obvious effect (aka "splendid").
        “We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see.”
        ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead

        Comment

        • Estie
          Veteran
          • Apr 2008
          • 2347

          #5
          Cloaks of magi, Lothlorien bows, crowns of magi or lordliness and blessed weapons all can get ESP. Even if I already have a helm of telepathy, I like to have options to be able to juggle better.

          Artifact status doesnt mean much regarding quality; while the best items are artifacts, some artifacts are rather mediocre (with randarts, they can be ouright bad).

          Crown of might is another superb ego item that has been used in my endgame kits.

          With jewelry, egos are more often than not better than the artifacts you find.

          Comment

          • PowerWyrm
            Prophet
            • Apr 2008
            • 2986

            #6
            You're forgetting crowns of serenity, which is IIRC the only source of both pConf and pStun excecpt for the Crown of Gondor.
            PWMAngband variant maintainer - check https://github.com/draconisPW/PWMAngband (or http://www.mangband.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=9) to learn more about this new variant!

            Comment

            • Ingwe Ingweron
              Veteran
              • Jan 2009
              • 2129

              #7
              Originally posted by PowerWyrm
              You're forgetting crowns of serenity, which is IIRC the only source of both pConf and pStun excecpt for the Crown of Gondor.
              And if you ignore "excellent with no high resist" you won't see the crown of serenity. One reason not to use quality settings for helms, but instead use the ego ignore menu.
              “We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see.”
              ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead

              Comment

              • Ingwe Ingweron
                Veteran
                • Jan 2009
                • 2129

                #8
                Originally posted by Estie
                Cloaks of magi, Lothlorien bows, crowns of magi or lordliness and blessed weapons all can get ESP. Even if I already have a helm of telepathy, I like to have options to be able to juggle better.
                Aren't all of those "splendid"? They each have obvious effects, and so would be seen even if you ignore "excellent but not splendid". The question was when is "excellent" better than "splendid".
                “We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see.”
                ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead

                Comment

                • Estie
                  Veteran
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 2347

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Ingwe Ingweron
                  Aren't all of those "splendid"? They each have obvious effects, and so would be seen even if you ignore "excellent but not splendid". The question was when is "excellent" better than "splendid".
                  They are, but the op was considering squelching everything once he had an artifact, which is not a good idea imo.

                  Comment

                  • Ingwe Ingweron
                    Veteran
                    • Jan 2009
                    • 2129

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Estie
                    They are, but the op was considering squelching everything once he had an artifact, which is not a good idea imo.
                    Ah, yes! I see, says the blind man.... I definitely agree with you. I misread the OP, thinking it was what the heading said, not what the post said.
                    “We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see.”
                    ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead

                    Comment

                    • Timo Pietilä
                      Prophet
                      • Apr 2007
                      • 4096

                      #11
                      Originally posted by brbrbr
                      Are there excellent items which are better than splendid?
                      Cloaks of protection. Those have shard resist, and if you lack that it might be better than stealth/aman/magi cloak.

                      Comment

                      • Ingwe Ingweron
                        Veteran
                        • Jan 2009
                        • 2129

                        #12
                        Yeah, when I come across a "splendid" item, I read "splendid" as: "obvious effects, and it might be what @ needs, but it might not." I read "excellent" as: "effects aren't obvious, but it still might be what @ needs, but it might not." And "good" means only pluses to AC, to-hit, or to-damage.
                        “We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see.”
                        ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead

                        Comment

                        • jrodman
                          Apprentice
                          • Feb 2009
                          • 56

                          #13
                          Not on original topic, but sort of on the drifted topic...

                          Is it possible to ignore regular Lanterns, but not Lanterns of Sight? I couldn't work out how. Similarly, I was stymied when trying to figure out how to ignore magical pebbles but not regular mithril shot.

                          Comment

                          • Ingwe Ingweron
                            Veteran
                            • Jan 2009
                            • 2129

                            #14
                            Originally posted by jrodman
                            Not on original topic, but sort of on the drifted topic...

                            Is it possible to ignore regular Lanterns, but not Lanterns of Sight? I couldn't work out how. Similarly, I was stymied when trying to figure out how to ignore magical pebbles but not regular mithril shot.
                            Use autoinscriptions to inscribe mithril shots and lanterns of true sight with "!k"

                            This will prevent them from being ignored when @ picks them up.
                            “We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see.”
                            ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead

                            Comment

                            • Timo Pietilä
                              Prophet
                              • Apr 2007
                              • 4096

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Ingwe Ingweron
                              Use autoinscriptions to inscribe mithril shots and lanterns of true sight with "!k"

                              This will prevent them from being ignored when @ picks them up.
                              I don't think that works with lanterns, because they don't require any kind of ID and don't get autoinscribed. If you ignore them they disappear as soon as you see them. Shots you need to pick up or at least ID to see what they are.

                              Haven't tested that though, but that's how it works with books.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              😀
                              😂
                              🥰
                              😘
                              🤢
                              😎
                              😞
                              😡
                              👍
                              👎