Inaccurate shopkeeper advice on quivers in 3.4.0

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dayv
    Rookie
    • Sep 2012
    • 8

    Inaccurate shopkeeper advice on quivers in 3.4.0

    In 3.4.0, quivers are limited to 40 shots, but a shopkeeper may still tell you:

    "If you have more than 99 items in your quiver, it will take up more slots."
    This is a simple fix, but the bug tracking site requests that I post a thread on the forum to have someone else confirm before opening a ticket. So that's this thread.
  • fizzix
    Prophet
    • Aug 2009
    • 3025

    #2
    Thanks for the correction.

    Comment

    • Dayv
      Rookie
      • Sep 2012
      • 8

      #3
      Bug opened:

      Comment

      • dos350
        Knight
        • Sep 2010
        • 546

        #4
        can i vouch it
        ~eek

        Reality hits you -more-

        S+++++++++++++++++++

        Comment

        • fizzix
          Prophet
          • Aug 2009
          • 3025

          #5
          Originally posted by Dayv
          It's already fixed in the dev branch and in what will be the 3.4.1 release branch. There were two advice messages that mentioned 99 per slot.

          Comment

          • Dayv
            Rookie
            • Sep 2012
            • 8

            #6
            Originally posted by fizzix
            It's already fixed in the dev branch and in what will be the 3.4.1 release branch. There were two advice messages that mentioned 99 per slot.
            Was it fixed before I opened the bug? Did I miss a previous bug on it? I'm trying to avoid opening unnecessary reports.

            Comment

            • Derakon
              Prophet
              • Dec 2009
              • 9022

              #7
              No, but it's such a trivial change (just modifying a text file) that it was easily fixed once the issue was known. Thanks for the report! (And thanks fizzix for making the necessary fix)

              Anyway, as a general rule I would much rather have redundant bug reports than missing bug reports.

              Comment

              • fizzix
                Prophet
                • Aug 2009
                • 3025

                #8
                Originally posted by Dayv
                Was it fixed before I opened the bug? Did I miss a previous bug on it? I'm trying to avoid opening unnecessary reports.
                I agree with Derakon. Thanks for both pointing out the error and submitting the bug report.

                Comment

                Working...
                😀
                😂
                🥰
                😘
                🤢
                😎
                😞
                😡
                👍
                👎