Looks like a new Angband Dev Blog is up. (17.8.2011)

[CJNyfalt]

I guess if I was going to make Hunger (and thirst?) more interesting, you'd want to get rid of the guaranteed food sources, and make food something you are more likely to have to find in the dungeon.
-Remove the provisioning spells and scrolls
-make most elemental attacks have a better chance to spoil rations (acid, poison, fire, whatever makes sense).
-make hunger=stun
- increase food drops somewhat

If I wanted to play Nethack, then I would. The food issue is why I prefer Angband.

[bio_hazard]

I'm not sure this [needing gentle reminders to head back to town] would fit in with how I play the game. I usually pick up almost any piece of equipment I come across until I hit my encumbrance limit, then only pick up new things if they are more valuable or more efficient resale/weight value than what I already have in inventory. As long as I'm holding enough to pay for 2 or 3 ?WoR and any !CCW I might have used I'll consider it a successful trip.

If you want reasons to head back to town, require that spells be learned in town, and maybe wait to apply level-dependent increases in abilities (stealth, fighting, bows&throws, etc) until the player visits town. Doing so just to put money in the bank doesn't sound that great.

I guess if I was going to make Hunger (and thirst?) more interesting, you'd want to get rid of the guaranteed food sources, and make food something you are more likely to have to find in the dungeon.
-Remove the provisioning spells and scrolls
-make most elemental attacks have a better chance to spoil rations (acid, poison, fire, whatever makes sense).
-make hunger=stun
- increase food drops somewhat


- maybe add a thirst counter as well as hunger (thirsty = stun, very thirsty = heavy stun).
- assuming we won't be adding water features to the terrain in V, players would replenish their hydration counter by drinking potions (including potion of water). So those !CLW or !Bold or !Infravision will have a use throughout the game.

Anything more complicated will probably drift toward something like Crawl, where food is generally available but not super-abundant, and food is spent for abilities like casting spells, going berzerk, etc. Your Minotaur Berzerker may devastate enemies when he goes on a rampage, but he'll pretty quickly run out of food if he uses that ability every time he goes into melee.

[takkaria]

A new Angband Dev Blog was just posted, and it covers economy.

http://angband-dev.blogspot.com/2011/08/some-thoughts-on-angband-economy.html

As for my reactions:
- I am worried that adding money weight would increase annoyances in the game.
- I am fine with reducing money drops and lowering prices.
- Requiring money for the home might hit beginner players too hard. However, a slot based model where the first slots are very cheap or free, and later ones increasing in price might work.
- I agree that food right now does not really add anything to the game.

I should probably add, as a quick disclaimer, that I'm not advocating (yet) that this is a blueprint for V - I don't think realism is a particularly good target in game design, but I think it can provide interesting ideas that may or may not improve gameplay. I'll hack away at it in a separate branch for a while and see how it plays, then put it out and see what other people think.

Thoughts on food would be most welcome - I know a few of us devs have been wondering for a while whether to nuke it or to make something of it.

[PowerDiver]

Not sure I see a reason to add realism to the Angband economy, but I could think of less obtrusive ways to do it than adding weight to coins.

It has nothing to do with realism. It would be meant as a gradual increasing push to return to town, implemented as a response to a fairly eloquent explanation why someone thought that was a good objective in game design. I didn't agree much with the arguments in the blog, but they reminded me of this particular idea.

[bio_hazard]

invisible super-donkeys carry your coins...

Not sure I see a reason to add realism to the Angband economy, but I could think of less obtrusive ways to do it than adding weight to coins.

Why not eliminate found money completely? Make "bounties" for monsters killed. Players can kill monsters or collect and sell items to get money.

[chris]

Angband needs a Central Bank, complete with ZIRP. That way, next time I see PDSM at the BM, I won't sweat the fact that I am 1.3 M gp short. I'll just borrow and payback later

And what about all those home mortgages. Silly players buy houses then die. What happens to the debt?

[EpicMan]

Maybe the town (and Angband) are a prison where all the monsters and evil creatures have been banished to. The player is there because he/she is insane and kills everyone he/she sees for no apparent reason. The hope is that the prisoners take care of each other, and so the town is supplied with weapons, one-size-fits-all armor, etc to encourage the imprisoned "adventurers" to go get themselves killed, and all money is shipped out whenever the players are all downstairs. That would account for the zero inflation.

As to the money not weighing anything, all adventurers carry a magic debit card that activates to teleport money to your bank account. And when you die, that money is appropriated by the state to pay for maintenance, shopkeepers, new store stock, etc.

The town/dungeon is enclosed in 'permanent' rock to keep the prisoners in, and the townfolk are prisoners too weak to make it downstairs.

It's all a conspiracy, I tell you!

[PowerDiver]

There was a single comment in the thread about why people dislike no_selling that seemed like something I might want to address. The idea was that there should be an ebb and flow to the game, with a natural incentive to return to town now and again.

I was thinking about adding a money belt, akin to the quiver, with a slot counting the number of coins of each money type you carry. It would use no inventory slots, but each coin type would have a weight and a value, and the weight would encumber you. When you return to town, all money is immediately put into your bank account, and the merchants charge the bank.

Then I decided it's just not worth the effort for what would be at best a small improvement, and most likely would just be annoying.

[CJNyfalt]

A new Angband Dev Blog was just posted, and it covers economy.

http://angband-dev.blogspot.com/2011/08/some-thoughts-on-angband-economy.html

As for my reactions:
- I am worried that adding money weight would increase annoyances in the game.
- I am fine with reducing money drops and lowering prices.
- Requiring money for the home might hit beginner players too hard. However, a slot based model where the first slots are very cheap or free, and later ones increasing in price might work.
- I agree that food right now does not really add anything to the game.