The only time I use the search command ("s" in the Angband keyset), is when I think I'm right next to a secret door/trap. You can mash on "s" but that's dangerous of course, the smart thing to do is INSERT-20-s, so you get repeat with disturbance if you find something or see a monster. If I don't know where a secret door is, but I think one's in the area (first room of the floor has no doors in it), I turn on searching mode ("S" in the Angband keyset) and run around the walls.
I propose to automatically repeat the search command so that you get 95% certainty that there's no secret adjacent to you. I would also add a message when you search but find nothing, so you get some feedback about what your character is doing (I think the message is a good idea regardless of auto-repeat). Both of these apply only to searching directly from the "s" command, not from the "S" searching mode or free perception searches.
For reference, a half-troll paladin has a searching score of 11%, and would have to search 26 times to get 95% certainty. A kobold rogue has 47% searching, and only has to search 5 times to get 95% certainty.
Does anyone have a good reason why the search command should NOT repeat in such a fashion, or why it should repeat to a different level of certainty?
I propose to automatically repeat the search command so that you get 95% certainty that there's no secret adjacent to you. I would also add a message when you search but find nothing, so you get some feedback about what your character is doing (I think the message is a good idea regardless of auto-repeat). Both of these apply only to searching directly from the "s" command, not from the "S" searching mode or free perception searches.
For reference, a half-troll paladin has a searching score of 11%, and would have to search 26 times to get 95% certainty. A kobold rogue has 47% searching, and only has to search 5 times to get 95% certainty.
Does anyone have a good reason why the search command should NOT repeat in such a fashion, or why it should repeat to a different level of certainty?
Comment